arielext
Headphoneus Supremus
Gjallarhorn had the same sized pads
Wow, that's actually quite small. The pads on the T5p (2nd Generation) are already compact for a full-sized headphone, so anything smaller would be stretching it, really.
On the other hand, my Gjallarhorn doesn't feel too constricting in use, so it must be a little bigger than the Magni? Or, my ears are just on the small side.
Yes, I have written 2 comparative impressions with the following headphones -Did you wrote some impressions on the Gjallarhorn yet?
Thanks I will read them in the wend thenYes, I have written 2 comparative impressions with the following headphones -
Whilst the Gjallahorn loses out to some of the esteemed members of the closed-back fraternity in a few technical areas, such as clarity and detail, treble brilliance, and staging, the Kennerton puts up a great fight in the bass arena. It has a fantastic, well-textured, hard-hitting low-end presentation. The makers promised some great bass, and they've certainly delivered, IMO.
I enjoy the HP-3 myself, but the Gjallarhorn has it beat in the bass department. The Klipsch has heavy lows that can be a touch boomy at the worst of times. However, what drags the HP-3 down is its overpowering treble section that, frankly, borders on sibilance. On the other hand, the Gjallarhorn is relatively dark, with a muted and shy treble range. Thus, the presentations of both headphones are quite distinct; they share 1 common feature, and that is the attention to the lower registers.Thanks I will read them in the wend then
I was following also the HP-3 thread, so glad to be able to read about a comparison.
If they don't leak and can hopefully pair up with DAPs such my R2r2000, then they might be an option (these or the Magni if opting for a cheaper option).
I enjoy the HP-3 myself, but the Gjallarhorn has it beat in the bass department. The Klipsch has heavy lows that can be a touch boomy at the worst of times. However, what drags the HP-3 down is its overpowering treble section that, frankly, borders on sibilance. On the other hand, the Gjallarhorn is relatively dark, with a muted and shy treble range. Thus, the presentations of both headphones are quite distinct; they share 1 common feature, and that is the attention to the lower registers.
Does the Pads are the same size? can you swap those even from the higher models?outer diameter:
- magni: 95mm
- vali: 105mm
Magni and Gjallarhorn share pad(size),Does the Pads are the same size? can you swap those even from the higher models?
Thanks for the comet - looks like some new HP going to join my collection, i will be smarter when they arrive.. I just need to chose what to orderMagni and Gjallarhorn share pad(size),
Vali and the open-back planars share pad(size). You can get 2 types of pads for Vali/Open planars in the form of ECL-01 and ECL-02
Can you swap between Magni/Gjallarhorn and Vali/Open planar pads? Don't try.
What were the other closed back headphones that you tried?Hi Guys. New owner of a Kennerton Magni (thanks to Arielext), and cannot be more happy.
I've tried a few top closed back headphones and these have become my favourite by far. Dynamics are insane in this pair. Good speed, great bass articulation with amazing slam when needed, thick mids and good treble without any sibilance.
The combination is just outstanding. I've seen that you are talking about the Klipsch HP3, I owned those for a bit and I can say that except for soundstage, the Magnis beat them in every department.
Bass in the Hp3 is powerfull but bleed into the mids and lacks the definition and clarity that the magnis has.
I thought it was hard to surprise me after years in this hobby, but the magnis managed to put a smile in my face every time I use them.
I have tried a bunch, but the most expensives I've tried are Final Sonorus VI, AudioTechnica W1000Z, Aeon flow Closed, Denon 7200 & 9200, Audioquest Nightowl and Beyerdynamic 1770 pro.What were the other closed back headphones that you tried?