tyrion
Can Jam '08 Lead Organizer
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2003
- Posts
- 10,921
- Likes
- 93
Quote:
I think that many members that have posted relative to your position in this thread did so because you came out on JL side when you took the position that people should be open minded. You contacted JL for some reason but didn't contact the OP. JL then sends you, a presumably disinterested party, a long email about the situation. I'm sorry, but like others, I find that to be more than just suspicious. I find it difficult to believe a company, like JL, with a difficult public relations problem would send that email to a disinterested third party. Again, presumably, you had nothing to do with this transaction. The position you have taken in this thread taken together with the email from JL creates an appearance of a relationship with JL that taints anything you say in their support.
Originally Posted by Morph201 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Contrary to what most may think, I was not trying to "stir" anything up, I merely wanted to view both sides with an objective eye. I'm not trying to prove a point one way or the other, reread most of my posts. I admit, some of the silly things that were said did get to me, for a minute, but calmer heads usually prevail and at this point people are going to think whatever they want due to their own biases. If I did JL an injustice by trying to present their side, then I apologize, I take full responsibility for that. I already expressed my view regarding BoilingFrogs situation. Boomana: I'm not exactly sure what you're issue is with me (???)... I'm not sure what I've done to make you so hostile towards me. Get to know me, you might find out that I'm a decent person. ![]() |
I think that many members that have posted relative to your position in this thread did so because you came out on JL side when you took the position that people should be open minded. You contacted JL for some reason but didn't contact the OP. JL then sends you, a presumably disinterested party, a long email about the situation. I'm sorry, but like others, I find that to be more than just suspicious. I find it difficult to believe a company, like JL, with a difficult public relations problem would send that email to a disinterested third party. Again, presumably, you had nothing to do with this transaction. The position you have taken in this thread taken together with the email from JL creates an appearance of a relationship with JL that taints anything you say in their support.