Quote:
From the sound of the various posts, I'm assuming it's "OK" to actually "break the law" if it's justified... |
Damn, reminds me of those damn freedom fighters in Europe during WWII. Who in their right mind would question authorities?
Quote:
1. If you think the government is cheating/lying/blackmailing/deceiving you, or simply gone morally bankrupt, it is perfectly justified to set your standards to the same level as theirs, and do unto them what they have done unto you. |
The government might be an image of it population?
Quote:
2. If it is extremely inconvenient, there is always the "downloading alternative", illegal or not, since it is perfectly justified for you to enjoy the same privileges other people have. |
This is the way economics work. Are you aware of Schumpeter? What has happened is that there was an radical innovation -- the Internet. This will naturally lead to creative destruction; Old ways of doing things will be replaced with new ways of doing things. The `weak' business models will simply go out of business.
Another way to look at it is through supply-demand. The fact is you can get all the music you want for nearly nothing. The only thing you pay is a slight chance of getting caught by RIAA/IFPI/whatever. It is not looked down upon from ordinary citizens.
I would draw the supply-demand curve for you, but I am not sure how it would be drawn in this situation.
The thing is, file sharing has been a reality since '99 when Napster was around. The Internet is a reality and it is a huge success! However, the record labels have not followed the innovations. They have
failed to do anything to revive themselves, even though they got the warning in '99.
I am not saying pirating is a good thing. It certainly could be if the copyright holders would join the new millennium. I do not download music myself, I am just trying to explain why people do it.
Quote:
Thanks everybody, sure is a very different culture from what our schools have us believe. Laws are bendable and subtle, everything has an implied meaning and are not meant to be taken literally. |
You are absolutely clueless, are you not? Watch the film
Copy Left, Copy Right. It is released under Creative Commons so the worse thing that could happen would be for you to get an another perspective.
On the contributing thing: Do you know why
anybody want pay for ads on this site? Because of the users. Why do the users come here? Because of the content. The content is provided by the users. Thus, every user helps to make a bit of earning to this site. That said, I do not hope Jude has to put his spare cash into this anymore.
The same argument hold for YouTube or Facebook. It is the content that holds a value.
-Rasmus