Dsnuts
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2011
- Posts
- 15,602
- Likes
- 31,943
@Dsnuts has them and did a fantastic objective comparison in his review.
I took that down since I wrote it on the Dk2001 review. I felt the comparison part took away the spot light a bit on the Dk2001 which I have in my ears as I type. I can say the DK2001 is a bit more technical in approach to sonics compared to the H40. H40 however has the one aspect that is very admirable for in ears and that is that big sound/ stage/ space.
This is what I wrote for the comparison between the DK2001 vs the H40.
4)Finally we have the DK2001 vs the new to the scene ISN H40 the other 5 star earphone I gave late last year.
ISN H40 has the wider stage, overall a fuller body of sound. More forward lower mids with a mild 3khz upper mids emphasis, overall it has the more even mid range vs the DK2001. H40 is better suited for male vocals due to this aspect. DK2001 mids has a steeper upper mid emphasis more closer in the 2Khz range which gives the mids some extra bite clarity and presence vs the H40. Female vocals sounds superb on the DK2001 as a result. DK2001 is way more comfortable and has the better quality of bass. For being $105 cheaper the H40 bass is no weak sauce. I can clearly tell the difference in the quality of dynamics used between the two. Isolation is similar with a slight edge to the H40. H40 mids have a warmer smoother tone especially in the mids vs the cooler and cleaner DK2001. DK2001 Imaging has better precision. Treble has better articulation. Slightly more emphasis and shimmer. Mid bass on the H40 has more energy, giving it one of the punchiest bass notes possible without stepping over any part of the mids. DK2001 doesn't fall too far behind but has the more dynamic sounding bass overall. Is better textured in the sub regions which most definitely digs deeper. H40 sounds grander in scope due to the wider fuller body of sound. Loses out on imaging and precision with better technical qualities to the DK2001 however.