Quote:
All amps have a sonic signature. But it's pretty trivial to duplicate said signature using EQ, so it isn't a good reason to buy a new amp if you have a decent one that isn't clipping with the transducer you are using.
It's still a good reason to buy one that has more power than needed, because the correct way to EQ is to reduce the volume of frequencies you don't want to boost, and thus you end up having to listen to your headphone "louder than necessary". Note: by this, I mean you have to increase volume, or everything that you EQ'ed down would sound tinny.
But EQ doesn't take away the characteristics of the headphone. You still need more power to increase volume. Since sound pressure level is measured using a logarithm function, it takes a lot more power to go up by just 1dB. Why do you think people need something as powerful as the Schiit Lyr?
Quote:
How could you possibly expect an amp to do that unless it was engineered specifically for that pair of headphones? You'd be much better off just getting an equalizer so you could not only use the amp for more than one pair of headphones, but also be a lot more accurate and have the ability to adjust it.
An amp can still "correct" the sound signature of the headphone by bring it closer to neutrality. It doesn't have to be perfect.
Quote:
Ok: these are serious points that I would have agreed with not long ago, and I'll try to explain why they might be worth modifying a little.
1. The O2 is a neutral amp - and a very good one - but it's hardly the only one. If you read the designer's own blog then his tests show that the Sansa Clip+ has a very neutral signature - and so do the Fiio e5 and e7 which he also tests, although they don't have the O2's ability to drive really difficult fullsize cans. The 02, being designed to drive really tough cans, is not a true pocket amp, so it makes sense to consider other that are, at least when the O2's full power is not required. Which maybe it isn't in this case.
2. At the end of a day a neutral source used with neutral headphones may not be neutral for you. Why? Because your damn non-standardized ear cavity will interact with the headphones and (even more so) IEMs. In fact, if you want real neutrality then the only answer is to EQ - see the "Tuning headphones with pink noise" article on head-fi. If you are EQing anyway, I don't see that an utterly flat signature is that desirable, although I would stay from heavily bass boosted amps.
PS for Ultrabike: aren't cmoy amps supposed to be for high impedance headphones? Is the U900's impedance that high???
1) The author of the O2 measured the Fiio E5 to have 3.5dB deviation from 20Hz to 20KHz, which I'd argue is actually very audible. Similarly, the E7 was also measured by him to have a 1.5dB drop at 80Hz. Now... take an EQ and dial 80Hz down by 1.5dB, and let me know if you can't "hear" that. If you can, then obviously neither the E5 or E7 is "neutral" or "linear", right?
2) Exactly. Which is why a colored amp with EQ may sound neutral to one person, and a neutral amp (say, O2) may not sound neutral to another person. O2 is used as the benchmark here because it "measures" well. But if we have to rely on subjective experience for this one, then please tell me when you have found one person who has listened to a "better" amp than a E6... to not recommend an E6 owner to upgrade.
And headphone impedance is not the end of the story. Their sensitivity/efficiency rating also plays into power requirement as well. In fact, here's a chart:
http://www.head-fi.org/t/476345/headphone-sensitivity-power-requirements-compared