jeremy6044
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2006
- Posts
- 116
- Likes
- 0
So you're saying the classic headphone out is more relaxed and detailed than the 4g line out through a good amp?? i'm confused.
Originally Posted by Sparky191 /img/forum/go_quote.gif The 160 is better bang for buck per gb no? |
Originally Posted by SBD /img/forum/go_quote.gif Yes but you don't count just gb no? The ipod touch obviously uses expensive flash while the classic uses cheap spinny hard drives. The classics were really slow and buggy when I got it but now it runs perfectly fine. |
Originally Posted by DOUGHN /img/forum/go_quote.gif for me ipod classic 80gb.. bang for the buck.... |
Originally Posted by stuge(original) /img/forum/go_quote.gif If you simply ask me .I didn't like the ipod touch at all ,because its not that responsive IMO .Still people love it .I-pod classic is much better to handle . |
Originally Posted by Sparky191 /img/forum/go_quote.gif With both though I'd have to get the FM remote to make it usable in the pocket. |
Originally Posted by DominicKarma /img/forum/go_quote.gif I don't think the touch works with the FM remote though... the classic can easily be used in pocket though ![]() |
Originally Posted by Sparky191 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Its a pity about the remote. While I like the touch interface, I personally find buttons are better for where I use my portables. In the office and commuting. |
Originally Posted by xlEnt /img/forum/go_quote.gif thats what help me decide, while the touch is really cool its kind of just a novelty i can imagine wearing off, while the 160gb classic, is what i want and need in a DAP (great battery life and huge capacity) |