Audiophile1811
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2010
- Posts
- 720
- Likes
- 302
Thank you!
I had the GR07BE, but it was too harsh for me and had sibilance issues, thats why I sold it. The MA-750 (I have) is good, but I miss the details, clarity and the highs.. Even the VSD3S has more details and I find it more accurate, but the build quality, the cable.. Cant even compare to the RHA.
Thats why I am interested if the T10 would be an real upgrade, and its not far behind the GR07, which costs half the price of the RHA..
I have owned the GR07 and the MKII and would agree with Audiophile1811 assessment. Having said that if you found the GR07BE to sibilant the T10I may be right up your alley.
After a night of burn in these have opened up some but lack the clarity and detail I love in an IEM when it comes to cymbals. But I do think these need more time burning in (my brain too!!) before I reach a final verdict.
Build and accessory wise these are one of the best IEMs I have owned though which easily justifies their cost as compared to the GR07 (and I think the GR07 comes well equipped!).
Another alternative for you might be the Pioneer DJE1500. It has treble similar to the GR07 but without the sibilance issues. But it will likely require 3rd party tips from either Sony or UE (I prefer UE myself).
BUT I suggest you wait for a couple of days to let us reviewers have more time with the T10I. Dynamic based IEMs really do need some time to settle in my opinion.
@dweaver I totally agree with the T10i's being an upgrade to the GR07's build quality & accessories. @honfoglalo As mentioned before, calling them an actual "upgrade" for you will depend on the signature you prefer. For example, if you didn't like the treble of the GR07 BE's but you liked the extra bass then you might find the bassier, inoffensive sound of the RHA's to suit you just right. Is that the type of sound you prefer?