Quote:
Originally Posted by stuartr
Thanks grinch. The sky out here in Santa Barbara is pretty amazing. That picture was taken up in the mountains at about 3500 feet, so it was probably even better. I used Kodak E100G, which is a pretty neutral film, so that is essentially what it looked like. No polarizers or filters, just a leica 50mm summicron lens, which is ridiculously sharp and very high contrast.
|
mmm leica. i dream of an m6 and a 50mm. it's all i ask for, why must it cost four grand? at first looking at that picture, i almost certainly figured some sort of color boost of some kind, as the blue just pops out at you so damn well, but i figured that wasn't your style.
Quote:
That nikon setup must be so much fun....I often think I am a bit of a masochist for still using a film rangefinder, but that feeling instantly dissipates when I release the shutter and advance the film. It's like budda. |
it's definitely fun. the instant gratification of digital is very addicting, but that didn't stop me from finding a mint F4 on ebay last week. it arrived on friday and it's such a dream, and built like a tank. i always wanted one when i was younger, and now i can finally afford to have one. of course, being compatible with all my lenses is a big plus. after hearing some interesting reviews of velvia, i bought a roll and threw it in the F4. haven't finished it yet though, but i'm hoping maybe this week i'll get through it and see how i like it compared to my digital shots.
after reading your site thoroughly a couple of weeks ago, i've decided that i definitely need to give that ilford fp4+ a try. i was looking for it at b&h but didn't see it on their shelf.
i have big respect for people that still shoot film. digital is so incredibly easy and lazy and inexpensive. i also think it's an awesome learning tool. i can fiddle with aperature settings and whatnot, and instantly see the differences that they make. shooting live music performances is a favorite of mine, and digital seems the way to go with that as well.