Well the Elear is more forward sounding, it”s more “playful” and less “serious” the SR1 is a very musical reference headphone in my opinion. It sound more mature in terms of tuning, more refined. Strangely while it’s open back the Elear soundstage is smaller.
The SR1 bass has more density, but it’s semi open so that was to be expected. It retains what I liked about the AudioQuest NightHawk bass but with much more detail and textures. Overall by the way I think the SR1 is similarly linear as the NightHawk but with a much clearer and articulate signature, the NH is much darker. The upper mids have a clear boost while the lower mids are lean on the Elear, the SR1 with the stock pads is fuller sounding with clearly more lower mids although it’s very subtly done as to not cloud the mids which strike a nice balance between being organic and articulate at the same time. Upper mids are beautifully tuned IMHO, silky smooth yet great clarity and a very accurate tone and timbre. The SR1 have good transparency as well, with just the right touch of warmth to make them highly musical. The Elear mids is rougher and nowhere near as refined but can be fun with the right music. I think the SR1 is more versatile. Also thanks to well extended treble, with a focus on upper treble that provide air and definition. Lower treble are more boosted on the Elear making it exciting and a bit fatiguing as well.
This makes the SR1 much more versatile across musical genres, it can handle pretty much anything I threw at it.
One thing that struck me is how fast the SR1 driver response is, this is quite a surprise for me with a 50mm driver. It’s faster than the Elear and much faster than the NightHawk.This is also a great thing for versatility, with fasted paced music. Transients also benefit from this.
Great to know I look forward to burn in sweetness
Any hints as to what changed for you with burn in ?