[Floris888]

Hello , how is the battery life on this device?Im looking for an upgrade, and DX300 its a serious contender.

 

[jamato8]

Hello , how is the battery life on this device?Im looking for an upgrade, and DX300 its a serious contender.

I don't keep track any longer but I get way more than enough for a days use. I would guess now around 13 hours at least. I have used it for day use and haven't gotten below 50% in some time now.

 

[alexlevn0791]

Don't use it myself, but have read that this would Work:

https://www.apkmirror.com/apk/netflix-inc/netflix/netflix-4-16-3-build-15172-release/

I installed this (also the one from APKPure) and it keeps telling to relaunch the Netflix app and show device failure....

 

[Floris888]

13 hours !!! Thats on another level. My dap cant manage more than 5 hours of listening on 4.4 and flac files.

 

[Ichos]

I installed this (also the one from APKPure) and it keeps telling to relaunch the Netflix app and show device failure....

It doesn't work.
I have tried but can't launch.
And although I have installed play store the Netflix doesn't show at the search.

 

[Whitigir]

My special order from Ibasso and thanks to @Paul - iBasso , the Amp11 MKii

Yes, the changes from the stock Amp11 MKII vs MKI is perhaps significant in my views

Take it in a long story short

MKI: I had to wait over 250 hours of burn in to have the warmth, bass, slow transients to improve and yet I am not all for it as it has the overwhelming warmth, density, and lower bass to be a little blooming and bleeding

MKII: out of the box, the signatures is more neutral, faster transients, sub bass and lower bass is tighter, faster, less booming, and the overall resulted in an even greater soundstage immersion and expansions, greater separations and layering, imagings as well

Yes sir! I prefer this MKII rather than MKI . I spot the changes in output transistors, and it related supporting components

 

[RONJA MESCO]

He sounded eargasmic

man, I havent had an Ibasso dap since my dx80...it may be time to make a return......

 

[aaf evo]

My special order from Ibasso and thanks to @Paul - iBasso , the Amp11 MKii

Yes, the changes from the stock Amp11 MKII vs MKI is perhaps significant in my views

Take it in a long story short

MKI: I had to wait over 250 hours of burn in to have the warmth, bass, slow transients to improve and yet I am not all for it as it has the overwhelming warmth, density, and lower bass to be a little blooming and bleeding

MKII: out of the box, the signatures is more neutral, faster transients, sub bass and lower bass is tighter, faster, less booming, and the overall resulted in an even greater soundstage immersion and expansions, greater separations and layering, imagings as well

Yes sir! I prefer this MKII rather than MKI . I spot the changes in output transistors, and it related supporting components

incoming: lots of disappointed mk1 owners

 

[davidmolliere]

incoming: lots of disappointed mk1 owners

Well from what I am reading, not at all as far as I am concerned... I like my tubey mk1

 

[aaf evo]

Well from what I am reading, not at all as far as I am concerned... I like my tubey mk1

i should have put a “/s”

I love mk1 too

 

[Whitigir]

incoming: lots of disappointed mk1 owners

Disappointed why ? The ideas is to be able to swap amp modules

Well from what I am reading, not at all as far as I am concerned... I like my tubey mk1

yes! The MKI is very tube like, and the MkII is also tube like , just not as much . Why prefer one when you can have both !!!
Refer to above ! Lol

 

[aaf evo]

Disappointed why ? The ideas is to be able to swap amp modules



yes! The MKI is very tube like, and the MkII is also tube like , just not as much . Why prefer one when you can have both !!!
Refer to above ! Lol

How much is the mk2?

 

[Whitigir]

How much is the mk2?

$249 plus shipping . You can order by emailing Paul....at least that was what I did

 

[gentzen]

My special order from Ibasso and thanks to @Paul - iBasso , the Amp11 MKii

Yes, the changes from the stock Amp11 MKII vs MKI is perhaps significant in my views

Take it in a long story short

MKI: I had to wait over 250 hours of burn in to have the warmth, bass, slow transients to improve and yet I am not all for it as it has the overwhelming warmth, density, and lower bass to be a little blooming and bleeding

MKII: out of the box, the signatures is more neutral, faster transients, sub bass and lower bass is tighter, faster, less booming, and the overall resulted in an even greater soundstage immersion and expansions, greater separations and layering, imagings as well

Yes sir! I prefer this MKII rather than MKI . I spot the changes in output transistors, and it related supporting components

Would you say MKII comes closer to 220 MAX than MKI in sound signature?

 

[Whitigir]

Would you say MKII comes closer to 220 MAX than MKI in sound signature?

It gravitates toward that direction aka it is more neutral than MKI. However, the Max is still very different in signatures.

I would say that the MKI is warmer than Dx160 where as the MKII is just about as neutral but with better energies and with better finesses. I feel like Ibasso house sound is back with MkII, at least from the view of what I have known the Dx160 for, which was already warmer than the typical Dx220-200.

If sound signatures is put aside, at least the layering and separations are an improvements in my opinions over the MKI. Both is still with that tube like transients, but a different kind of tubes. Let’s just say MKII is Mullard NOS back in WWI era where the MKI is Mullard renewed and current productions tubes EL34 as an example