Infoseeker
Headphoneus Supremus
Are there new production parts to mimic the TI's performance?
To mimic the Signature ? Possibly, but however you tweak and bend it, the base Metal will not respond the same, and there will be the differences. (Speaking from experiences)Are there new production parts to mimic the TI's performance?
You too can be exclusive for 1K more than the OGAlso, for anyone who asked me for my takes on these questions
“I wonder why Ibasso didn’t use the same tuning on both chassis” ?
Chassis materials do effect sound performances. Not that companies that cared about sound quality would deliberately tune and use different components to make it different. It is just that due to the sound being differences. They are forced to do so. The one who cares that is
Yes, be skeptical about chassis sound, it is both healthy and good
Did Ibasso just reserved all premium components for Titanium and watered down Stainless ?
No, at least I don’t think so, and I don’t take it so. We all have seen that Ibasso never planned Titanium from the beginning, and Stainless is the most expensive Flagship yet in Ibasso line up. So I believe that it was tuned and designed to be the best that Ibasso team could have think off
However, the Thor Hammer came down, and the bars are set further, as the 15th anniversary are being celebrated, so the Pride will have to shown. Titanium chassis were then realized as premium Metal, and as mentioned previously. Titanium chassis slightly altered the sound signature and away from the marks of references for being the best by Ibasso team. So the next journey to tune again and seek for the best performances from Titanium were formed.
Stainless were tuned to be the best performer by Ibasso team. Titanium were tuned to be the best performer by Ibasso team, and both referred to The chassis metal being different. They are just different, that is all
Whichever version you have is the best from Ibasso for that base Materials , and you should be proud to still be in the exclusive club of the 500 !
No, should be Exclusive Club of 50 Ti World Wide only, exclude China Locally.....Period....Also, for anyone who asked me for my takes on these questions
“I wonder why Ibasso didn’t use the same tuning on both chassis” ?
Chassis materials do effect sound performances. Not that companies that cared about sound quality would deliberately tune and use different components to make it different. It is just that due to the sound being differences. They are forced to do so. The one who cares that is
Yes, be skeptical about chassis sound, it is both healthy and good
Did Ibasso just reserved all premium components for Titanium and watered down Stainless ?
No, at least I don’t think so, and I don’t take it so. We all have seen that Ibasso never planned Titanium from the beginning, and Stainless is the most expensive Flagship yet in Ibasso line up. So I believe that it was tuned and designed to be the best that Ibasso team could have think off
However, the Thor Hammer came down, and the bars are set further, as the 15th anniversary are being celebrated, so the Pride will have to shown. Titanium chassis were then realized as premium Metal, and as mentioned previously. Titanium chassis slightly altered the sound signature and away from the marks of references for being the best by Ibasso team. So the next journey to tune again and seek for the best performances from Titanium were formed.
Stainless were tuned to be the best performer by Ibasso team. Titanium were tuned to be the best performer by Ibasso team, and both referred to The chassis metal being different. They are just different, that is all
Whichever version you have is the best from Ibasso for that base Materials , and you should be proud to still be in the exclusive club of the 500 !
Here it isI have had a Neutron license for years and just downloaded it to the 3Max. Sounds excellent. Are there any special settings you Neutron folks have set?
As I knew you would. Gracias
Looks like you are having the same problem as me…. I’m trying to achieve the 768khz rather than 705.6khz.i tried to replicate your error and I can’t. Every file multiple 44.1 gives me proper OS value (4x 176,4, 16x 705,6), the same with 48, and I can just change it on fly - NMP and player immediately change OS..
Does the sd card burn in happen if I let the dap play files from card without the headphones plugged in ?No way, the CS version take 75 hours, the non CS and Sandisk e dge only 10 hours . But the CS gas a more severe differences during burning than others
Ship me a free SS, I will compare for you
Never tried that, but it should, I thinkDoes the sd card burn in happen if I let the dap play files from card without the headphones plugged in ?
Did you check Follow source frequency ? He didn’tLooks like you are having the same problem as me…. I’m trying to achieve the 768khz rather than 705.6khz.
Did behemothkat achieve the 768khz after checking the Follow Source Frequency?Did you check Follow source frequency ? He didn’t