OK, found: DX220MAX is 14 hours digital. I guess DX300MAX could also be around 10-12 hours (let's not forget the dual AK4499's) maybe?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
iBasso DX300 MAX Dual AK4499 Snapdragon 660 Octa-Core 6GB RAM 128GB ROM NEW Firmware: 2.02Available.
- Thread starter Paul - iBasso
- Start date
Vitaly2017
Headphoneus Supremus
OK, found: DX220MAX is 14 hours digital. I guess DX300MAX could also be around 10-12 hours (let's not forget the dual AK4499's) maybe?
I don't think it will last more then 7 to 8 hours from full charge, which is the norm for this kind of dap
Infoseeker
Headphoneus Supremus
The two chips of ak4499 are heavy power drawers?
Those 4499 are desktop dac level chips, not the energy saving portable chips, like the cirrus type in the current DX300.The two chips of ak4499 are heavy power drawers?
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Posts
- 28,350
- Likes
- 32,189
Agreed, and the 4499 is only less energy consumption than the arch rivals 9038pro LOL.Those 4499 are desktop dac level chips, not the energy saving portable chips, like the cirrus type in the current DX300.
The citrus chips in DX300 is also desktop level chips. The only exception is that Cirrus technologies are less power demanding, and is actually very efficient VS others
220MAX is with ES9028PRO which are also desktop level, plus they are 8 channel DACs, and 4499s are 4 channel DACs. Still, as far as I remember they are both rated at around 500 mW, so probably we won't see a big drop from 220MAX up time.Agreed, and the 4499 is only less energy consumption than the arch rivals 9038pro LOL.
The citrus chips in DX300 is also desktop level chips. The only exception is that Cirrus technologies are less power demanding, and is actually very efficient VS others
The citrus chips in DX300 is also desktop level chips.
Love me some citrus chips, too many and I get heartburn though
ibasso should make a "330Max" with latest ES9038PRO next.
That way they don't have to wait for AKM supplies.
That way they don't have to wait for AKM supplies.
Infoseeker
Headphoneus Supremus
Paul - iBasso
Sponsor: iBasso
The DX300 has a very good play time, a little longer than the DX220Max and the digital battery has been increased by 1/3.
Stay updated on iBasso at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Posts
- 28,350
- Likes
- 32,189
OMG! An official responds! thank you Paul. That is lovely to hearThe DX300 has a very good play time, a little longer than the DX220Max and the digital battery has been increased by 1/3.
horatiu
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Posts
- 243
- Likes
- 315
That would defeat the purpose of getting rid of the 4499s they already have.ibasso should make a "330Max" with latest ES9038PRO next.
That way they don't have to wait for AKM supplies.
That would defeat the purpose of getting rid of the 4499s they already have.
Actually I can agree it's not necessary.. ibasso probably already tried all the chips in existence already. I would assume all thier choices are already optimal.
….What if the chips were intended for the DX300….but they only bought an initial 500….then the akm factory had a fire…then they used cirrus potato chips….then why not use em for a new Maxxx….then….
itz a conspiracy!
itz a conspiracy!
horatiu
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Posts
- 243
- Likes
- 315
It is possible but then again, unlikely.
Suppose they find themselves in the fabulous situation that the player has much higher demand than they expected. They won't be able to produce, and hence, to sell, enough to meet demand. There is no reason for going with a chip that is not currently in production unless you have some stock and need to put it to good use.
Please don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with the 4499, quite the contrary.
Suppose they find themselves in the fabulous situation that the player has much higher demand than they expected. They won't be able to produce, and hence, to sell, enough to meet demand. There is no reason for going with a chip that is not currently in production unless you have some stock and need to put it to good use.
Please don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with the 4499, quite the contrary.
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)