greyforest
500+ Head-Fier
i thought you were being sarcastic about the clipping?
Yes and i am still being sarcastic.......
Honestly i do not expecting any difference from optic cable, and this one certainly not making the sound better.
i thought you were being sarcastic about the clipping?
Thanks MK. I had not realised there is a difference between 'built-in output' and 'systems output'.optical from imac i use roon in exclusive mode
Sarcasm is fine, but I still have no clue if he likes the cable or not, why not just tell the truth about his impressions?i thought you were being sarcastic about the clipping?
Did you order from Futureshop.uk then they where really fast? For me to ship to sweden it can take a week or more sometime.Yes and i am still being sarcastic.......
Honestly i do not expecting any difference from optic cable, and this one certainly not making the sound better.
Sarcasm is fine, but I still have no clue if he likes the cable or not, why not just tell the truth about his impressions?
Did you order from Futureshop.uk then they where really fast? For me to ship to sweden it can take a week or more sometime.
Anyway thats not what i am hearing with this optical cable( less veil, more transparancy). But you seem out of luck with the gear you have recently bought for exe TT2 problems and all. What do you mean by clipping?
Oh i think its has very clear and articulate voices. I get the impression that the supra (i have that is much cheaper) has more bass and is warmer then the mavros but mavros is more articulate with less bloom and veil. Supra is more forgiving and sound smoother with porer recordings lowerbitrate content. Mavros have more higher frequency information more texture. Anyway thats my impression.I ordered from the local dealer with much more reasonable price. I guess tt2 and hugo2 are different after all. Clipping means distortion, the diaphragm is clipping. My impression with this cable on tt2 is it made the soundstage little bit expanded. But also made midrange sounded thin. Sometimes I can barely hear the dialogue during movies scene.
It should, but the thing with optical and mac is that the signal is coming from the mac’s dac not pure data directly to the chord dac. Cause in audirvana if you use optical is doesnt say chord dac as the output but the system’s output (mac).
Why don't you just use the TT2 in DAC mode/fixed output?Guys some help please.
did some major upgrades in last 2 weeks
I need to know best volume the tt2 should be at when feeding another preamp
I got a parasound JC5 AMP and the JC2BP PRE... the TT2 feeds the JC2
WHERE SHOULD I SET THE TT2?
all of this goes into Raidho D3.1 loudspeakers.
thanks
There is no fixed dac output as such in chord dacs. It's just a volume preset. Ideally I would like to use High output of tt2 without much digital attenuation into a power amp directly. ( I use ahb2 power amp in low gain which allows tt2 operate in its higher output range without much digital attenuation ) if you want to use tt2 with pre, then if you use too high a output of tt2 it will be attenuated in analog domain by pre. If you use too low a output of tt2 then you won't need much analog attenuation in pre but then there will be more digital attenuation in tt2. I have experimented with mojo and a class d integrated amp. I found analog pot attenuation has lesser depth perception than mojo's digital attenuation. So a best balance has to be found between the two attenuation.Why don't you just use the TT2 in DAC mode/fixed output?
If you're feeding an external preamp, this is how the TT2 should be used/set.