Post in thread 'Watts Up...?' https://www.head-fi.org/threads/watts-up.800264/post-15391744Rob said that there is no warm up needed? Haven't seen that, but thanks for sharing.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Hugo TT 2 by Chord Electronics - The Official Thread
- Thread starter ChordElectronics
- Start date
SunRa Fan
100+ Head-Fier
Music to my ears. I auditioned the expanse previously and spent two hours with them but I’ve not been happy with the amp I bought to run them. The TT2 is a bit of a bucket list component for me but I’ve heard it with headphones and I KNOW how good it really is. Thanks to everyone who’s taken the time to answer my questions.The Answer is Yes. Dan Clark used TT2 as reference when making the Stealth.
TheMiddleSky
Headphoneus Supremus
Can the TT2 properly drive a DCA Expanse? Are there any TT2 owners who can attest to this?
Yes, and don't even need the xlr out at the back of TT2.
Articnoise
Headphoneus Supremus
Have you tried it yourself and don't think you hear any difference?Except the designer Mr. Watts!
But what does he know anyway . . . .
All SS needs and hours. On most it is not that noticable after 30min but an hour makes a difference on all SS I have tried. SPECIALLY TT2!!!
Frankly I have never looked for it, TBH!Have you tried it yourself and don't think you hear any difference?
I don't believe in warm up on digital circuits, nor in solid state amplification circuits, so I happen not to find it!
The science is against it.
Also Rob Watts has proven to be a very meticulous and thorough designer. He wouldn't allow such random variables to incur.
He takes his time on his designs, leaving no stones unturned.
Articnoise
Headphoneus Supremus
Frankly I have never looked for it, TBH!
I don't believe in warm up on digital circuits, nor in solid state amplification circuits, so I happen not to find it!
The science is against it.
Also Rob Watts has proven to be a very meticulous and thorough designer. He wouldn't allow such random variables to incur.
He takes his time on his designs, leaving no stones unturned.
You don't have to look for it. If you have the TT2 on for a few hours, you will either hear that it sounds better after a while or not. You would think that someone who writes - Always try to listen in their signature would be a little more open-minded.
Also science is not against achieving optimal temperature. Where did you get that from? If there is one thing that is certain, it is that materials and components are affected by temperature. Everything from water that takes on completely different properties when it freezes or heats up to the combustion effect in an engine made for different fuels.
It also says, after you check the numbers and graphs.You don't have to look for it. If you have the TT2 on for a few hours, you will either hear that it sounds better after a while or not. You would think that someone who writes - Always try to listen in their signature would be a little more open-minded.
That was an elbow, mostly for pure objectivism .
Well science is against audible change in a low powered digital/headphone amp. Of course temperature always changes things, it is by how much? is it going to be audible?Also science is not against achieving optimal temperature. Where did you get that from? If there is one thing that is certain, it is that materials and components are affected by temperature. Everything from water that takes on completely different properties when it freezes or heats up to the combustion effect in an engine made for different fuels.
Also, a designer of Rob Watts calibre, would not allow for such a thing! if TT2 being used in Alaska or Africa, it should sound the same! we are not talking about a tube amp here.
A minor change after five seconds, may be, an audible change after a few hours? that's an insult.
This is one of those areas that one's belief plays a large part!
Hence my atheist/non-believer statement.
Perhaps @Rob Watts can chip in.
If anyone knows for sure . . .
Last edited:
Articnoise
Headphoneus Supremus
BS science isn't against audible change in a low powered digital/headphone amp. If you think that there is no gain why don't you get a ASR approved DAC from Topping or Monoprice instead? Then you would at least be consistent.It also says, after you check the numbers and graphs.
That was an elbow, mostly for pure objectivism .
Well science is against audible change in a low powered digital/headphone amp. Of course temperature always changes things, it is by how much? is it going to be audible?
Also, a designer of Rob Watts calibre, would not allow for such a thing! if TT2 being used in Alaska or Africa, it should sound the same! we are not talking about a tube amp here.
A minor change after five seconds, may be, an audible change after a few hours? that's an insult.
This is one of those areas that one's belief plays a large part!
Hence my atheist/non-believer statement.
Perhaps @Rob Watts can chip in.
If anyone knows for sure . . .
Instead of asking others, why not listen and see for yourself?
One exempel. https://www.jauch.com/blog/en/ask-the-engineer-how-temperature-sensitive-are-quartz-crystals/
Last edited:
I wait to see if Mr. Watts would oblige.BS science isn't against audible change in a low powered digital/headphone amp. If you think that there is no gain why don't you get a ASR approved DAC from Topping or Monoprice instead? Then you would at least be consistent.
Instead of asking others, why not listen and see for yourself?
One exempel. https://www.jauch.com/blog/en/ask-the-engineer-how-temperature-sensitive-are-quartz-crystals/
BTW, I did get some ASR approved DACs.
It appears, so did you!
Haven't you heard? all Chord DACs have passed ASR's extra critical measurements and tests with flying colours.
Peace.
GuiltyRocker
1000+ Head-Fier
@Rob Watts can you respond to the questions about temperature and your DACs? Do your DACs sound better after warm up, or not? Did you test different temperatures and how that affects sound quality?
GuiltyRocker
1000+ Head-Fier
All the Chord DACs have landed in their top DACs section, then it is so funny to see man try to dissuade people from buying them, because his Chi-Fi stuff keeps coming, seems like every month there is a new modelI wait to see if Mr. Watts would oblige.
BTW, I did get some ASR approved DACs.
It appears, so did you!
Haven't you heard? all Chord DACs have passed ASR's extra critical measurements and tests with flying colours.
Peace.
ASR objects to two things regarding Chord DACs.All the Chord DACs have landed in their top DACs section, then it is so funny to see man try to dissuade people from buying them, because his Chi-Fi stuff keeps coming, seems like every month there is a new model
1- the price. they argue cheaper DACs sound just as good (so far I am not convinced)
2- Rob Watts claims regarding audible benefits of the pulse array topology.
Indeed first one is an assumption on invalidity of the second!
If indeed the pulse array topology and Rob Watts designs get accepted as superior , then the price is not high.
So in reality, it is all about RW deep down .
Frankly, I do own a Topping DX7 pro desktop dac. It is good, very good, and I paid only pittance for it in a used but pristine condition, so I am not complaining.
But the ultimate SQ vs my Hugo2 ?
Hugo2 wins 9 out of ten.
The one time it doesn't is music type related! The Topping sounds a bit softer, which matches some recordings.
GuiltyRocker
1000+ Head-Fier
I love that you say it how it is, I tried some of the stuff they talk about and it fatigues my ears. Can't take it, I'll stay with Rob Watts regardless of what they say, or write.ASR objects to two things regarding Chord DACs.
1- the price. they argue cheaper DACs sound just as good (so far I am not convinced)
2- Rob Watts claims regarding audible benefits of the pulse array topology.
Indeed first one is an assumption on invalidity of the second!
If indeed the pulse array topology and Rob Watts designs get accepted as superior , then the price is not high.
So in reality, it is all about RW deep down .
Frankly, I do own a Topping DX7 pro desktop dac. It is good, very good, and I paid only pittance for it in a used but pristine condition, so I am not complaining.
But the ultimate SQ vs my Hugo2 ?
Hugo2 wins 9 out of ten.
The one time it doesn't is music type related! The Topping sounds a bit softer, which matches some recordings.
Rob Watts
Member of the Trade: Chord Electronics
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2014
- Posts
- 3,155
- Likes
- 12,569
It also says, after you check the numbers and graphs.
That was an elbow, mostly for pure objectivism .
Well science is against audible change in a low powered digital/headphone amp. Of course temperature always changes things, it is by how much? is it going to be audible?
Also, a designer of Rob Watts calibre, would not allow for such a thing! if TT2 being used in Alaska or Africa, it should sound the same! we are not talking about a tube amp here.
A minor change after five seconds, may be, an audible change after a few hours? that's an insult.
This is one of those areas that one's belief plays a large part!
Hence my atheist/non-believer statement.
Perhaps @Rob Watts can chip in.
If anyone knows for sure . . .
My experience of warm-up period is limited, as all my desktop DACs are powered 24/7. But when using my portable DACs (with or without Hugo M scaler) when on flights, things do sound a bit bright and flat in soundstage for the first 10 minutes. After 10 minutes, the sound is warmer with better depth - everything snaps into focus. Now this maybe my ears settling in to the pressure equivalent of 6,000 feet altitude, or the headphones, or the DACs themselves.
As to measurements, the DACs measure identically from cold. But measurements only tell you how bad something is, not how good it is. The kind of subjective effect warm-up creates would easily be obtained from effects that are well below -200 dB - something that will never be measurable with analogue hardware.
@Rob Watts can you respond to the questions about temperature and your DACs? Do your DACs sound better after warm up, or not? Did you test different temperatures and how that affects sound quality?
Temperature (and other effects) can have huge measurable problems, and my DACs 30 years ago all measured differently with time of day or break-in, with some needing hand tweaks to get consistent results. These issues with DACs are myriad, and it's something I have eliminated - certainly from a measurement perspective. Given my comments above, 10 minutes for SQ warm-up with no break-in period is not something I worry about, so I would say this issue is not a problem. Next time I am listening to a cold desktop DAC I will check to see if there is any warm-up problems, as I rather suspect my issues are down to planes rather than anything else.