There's been some discussion about the use of optical and Coax in Chord DACs to bypass the amanero chip controlling the USB, claiming that it reduces the internal RF produced by the chip itself. I have been doing some tests with the TT2, using ( optical, Coax and USB) in the last couple of days to review the iFi NEO Stream. That led me to be able to detect some differences between them when coming from the same source (NEO). My findings were that Optical and Coax sound very similar, while USB subjectively feels like having a bit more bass quantity but less defined texture, and curiously a deeper stage. However.... focus and instrument separation is a tad better while using coax and optical. Using a very clean USB signal helps a lot, like the one you get from a good streamer. In the other hand, optical is very consistent and feels less system dependent; in contrast Coax suffers if the source is not clean due to RF. Testing the SRC DX connected to different USB sources can go from really poor sounding, even presenting cracks and pops while playing HQplayer 768khz when connected directly to my Mac mini, to sound the best when plugged to the super clean signal of the NEO Stream at the same sample rates. If your Doku doesn't have a good implementation of RF control and isolation, your coax will be a detrimental factor in your signal. In my opinion, making optical work properly in your system, sounds like your best bet to feed the Mscaler. At the end, the Mscaler aside of being an upsampler is a good DDC when paired with Chord DACs, USB should work well too....Any advantages coax vs usb?
Perform some tests with tracks you know well, and trust your ears, keep the one you like the most and enjoy, you have a very nice setup.
Last edited: