haloxt
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2008
- Posts
- 3,644
- Likes
- 69
Dude I was joking okay? Joke=lie for fun.
Originally Posted by haloxt /img/forum/go_quote.gif Dude I was joking okay? Joke=lie for fun. |
Originally Posted by JaZZ /img/forum/go_quote.gif In this case I would definitely go with my ears. What more do you want from a component than the sonic trait you like! Does it really matter that «science speaks against it»? Moreover, «with full knowledge that the DACs sounded exactly the same» ... «I knew this wasn't possible» are statements I would never make myself in the context of audio. . |
Originally Posted by upstateguy /img/forum/go_quote.gif But ears don't always tell the truth, Jazz. What I was alluding to in my post was a form of "imprinting" that occurs when you audition a new piece of equipment or a cable. Once the impression gets "burned in" (to your brain), all the listening in the world doesn't seem to be able to change it, so in my case the old cable always sounded better and each DAC retained the original sound signatures I found not to exist. This has been brought up before, but there is also sufficient anecdotal evidence to suggest that you can adjust and alter a perception over time as your brain does with your nose. Over time, your brain has learned to delete this non-essential information from view. The same thing happens with things you hear. Bothersome and non-essential "things" become attenuated to the point where you're not aware of them any more. This might be one of the reasons why things usually sound better over time. USG |
Originally Posted by BIG POPPA /img/forum/go_quote.gif What am I going to do just look at the gear? Heck no, I'm listening to it right now. Like I do almost every night. |