greenkiwi
1000+ Head-Fier
@bimmer100 I'm curious if you'd responded to the question about it being fully balanced or just inverts the signals somewhere after the DAC stage to get XLR outs.
Analog Output | |
THD 0.00030% | |
SNR -126dB | |
Voltage Output 2.5Vrms(RCA), 5Vrms(XLR) | |
THD 0.00020% | |
SNR -120dB | |
Voltage Output 1.25Vrms(RCA), 2.5Vrms(XLR) | |
Output Stage type | discrete Class A - Bipolar Junction Transistors. direct coupled. The big MKP Cap in output stage is actually for power supply and not for signal coupling! Output impedance is 200Ohm. |
Hi guys...I apologize if this has been covered but I didnt not find the answer when searching this thread.
What is the native file format for the Spring DAC? I am not sure if I am asking this right but in other words, what does the Spring DAC convert all incoming signals to before processing at the output stage? Sample rate, bit depth, DSD or PCM?
I am asking because I would like to compare sending the Spring DAC whatever its native file format is from HQ Player with letting the DAC do its own internal conversion. My previous experience has shown that moving as much of the computing from the DAC can yield some positive sonic improvements.
Thank you!
I am sure the circuit is truly balanced, I believe the comment about XLR being better than RCA is from the Designer and was in reference to how it handles DSD on the outputs. I've actually sent an email to Jeff to clarify on this. But otherwise, the output stage specs are as follows: This is THD, not THD+N. The specs on website for THD+N are 0.00068% for PCM, and 0.00050% for DSD
fully balance
Please don't take this post in any other way than how it comes across to a potential customer.
This product is not very well known; it does not have much of any reviews other than an impression or two. We are depending on getting solid facts to make an informed choice. Our motto is "time will tell..." so in time all will be revealed. We have many demo dacs being sent over to be sent off to the list that is well over a dozen reviewers now.
At the moment you are the only one providing answers by directly communicating to the manufacturer. It does not instill confidence in a potential customer when you are making available upgraded versions of the Spring, but you do not know basic design criteria such as whether or not the circuit design is balanced.
How did you consider what impact the Jensen caps or modified transformers would have on the circuit design? Jeff suggested many of these mods, but they were too expensive for the original design. He wanted to make a dac that was affordable to everyone
bimmer100 I did not want to quote your entire post, but that was very helpful. May I suggest putting the information about the tuning and the collaboration with Jeff prominently on your website? I am very interested in this DAC and information like that helps a lot since there are far too many people in this field that make claims about everything under sun making improvements about the sound.
Knowing that the design engineer would have opted for the upgrades, if not for cost considerations, heavily tilts my opinion on the matter. Of course hearing it will be the ultimate test.
When you make demo units available for folks on this thread, I would ask to be amongst them. I'm currently looking for an excellent DAC to complete my signal chain. It'll be paired as follows:
FLAC from PC--> Schiit Wyrd--> Spring --> Cavalli Liquid Gold--> Focal Utopia
I look forward to more impressions and reviews and thank you for the detailed response.
Looking forward to my Spring Level3 arriving in a couple weeks or so. Very excited about this DAC. Reallly hoping it will be my end-game. Thank you so much @bimmer100 for your invaluable assistance and for answering all my questions. It's truly been a pleasure doing business with you Tim.