SilverEars
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Posts
- 14,513
- Likes
- 6,504
Surprised you thought Sundara was peaky, at least compared to DT1990.Here you go: https://www.ebay.com/itm/3-5mm-OCC-...XX-HE-400i-headphones-Both-3-5mm/293421773018 (looks like they increased the price by $4 but on the plus side if you're in the US, they now stock it in their CA warehouse). Have been very happy with them as they've been much easier to live with than the stiff OEM cable.
So I'm generally not a huge believer in burn-in (I do it out of habit to silence the inevitable "but you didn't burn-in...") and my first impression was that the Sundara was insanely bright and absolutely not what I wanted. I got these to potentially replace my DT1990's since while I love the sound sig, it was just too bright for me and fatiguing to listen to for long periods. I was bummed since I watched/read a bunch of reviews stating the Sundara's treble was tamer than the DT1990's and it didn't jive with what I was hearing, so I decided to burn them in (and not even for that long, I think just a few hours max) and after some regular use, I must say that I'm not hearing the ear piercing treble I initially heard. Thought perhaps it was just mental burn-in but after a/b'ing with the DT1990's I'm very happy that's it's not as sharp by comparison.
While the sound sig is similar, the DT1990 certainly has more bass quantity but for me it's not the same "quality". What intrigued me most was the planar bass slam I kept hearing about and unfortunately I'm not very articulate with describing sounds but the best way to describe the difference is that with the DT1990 (and imagine if you will if a bass note lasted as long as a cymbal's) it's as if someone placed their hand on the drum to stop the note from finishing naturally whereas that occurs with the Sundara; it's subtle but appreciably noticeable. Also, the sound stage and imaging is far better on the Sundara and that's what really sealed it for me (I'll be listing my DT1990 soon for anyone interested). I mean even this is subjective since if you like a more intimate sounding (and slightly better isolating) headphone and aren't treble sensitive then the DT1990 might be better for your needs. My only minor quibble (aside from the cable) is that the pads aren't thick enough for me so my left ear lobe is making contact with the inside of the pad. I've temporarily addressed this by inserting a thicker-ply tissue around the rear-half's inner circumference to increase the depth - will be looking for some other material or perhaps different pads in the long run.
EDIT: Despite the lower impedance (37Ω vs 250Ω), the Sundara is definitely "harder to drive" than the DT1990; I need to set my SBX G6 to High gain to really let the Sundara shine whereas I can stick with Low gain w/the DT1990.
Can you provide exact details how one can tell whether they have the "stealth" version? Also any chance of referencing/linking pics of the differences? Thx!
I'm not surprised you'd think the stage is more expansive than DT1990. Beyers are not really that open of headphones even if they look like theres tiny openings around. I think they keep somewhat enclosed to increase bass response with the dynamic driver since it's hard to do with being open as Sennheiser demonstrates. It's interesting how Hifimans are so open compared to other planars out there, yet they keep a fairly linear bass response.
I generally found Sundara bass less than plentiful compared to something like HE500, but it did come out with electronic tracks.
Last edited: