frankrondaniel
500+ Head-Fier
Did they tell you what's the root cause of the HO problem?![]()
Unfortunately no specifics other than they confirmed that it didn't work.
Did they tell you what's the root cause of the HO problem?![]()
Can anyone tell me why DAP uses dock to get line out will consume more battery than normal listening with PO? Hm901, zx-1, ipod
But DAP will dedicated line out jack saves battery from using line out...
That doesn't make any sense. The only thing I can think about is that some DAP has both LO and PO activated all the time, even though you are not using PO. Other disable PO when the LO is plugged in (which is easier to implement when you have a dedicated LO jack) and therefore able to save more battery. Actually some who use HM901's LO exclusively have remove the amp module all together to improve the battery life.
I reckon this has nothing to do with LO vs. PO, but more to do with how different implementation works.
@jamato8 how to get balanced LO out of the 901? I remember someone say the upcoming dock will only have Unbalanced output?
but that line out of AK240 is not yet confirmed to be "line out".... and people will spend extra hundreds of dollars for mod to get the line out...then iriver will knock it saying it is not superior SQ... whole thing is a bit bizarre...
Just went to a local shop today to demo the Chord Hugo and AK240. Below is a little comparison to the 901.
Hugo: I mainly came for the Hugo but its damn battery ran out after 20 mins or so. The first impression I got was that the Hugo was very resolving, and open and bold sounding. It projected a larger sonic image than the 901 but at the same it could fill up that space with lots of details (instead of bump up the mids to thicken the sound). Bass on the Hugo was noticeably tighter but the very short decay made it sound a bit unnatural to me. Overall I would say the Hugo sounded very hi-fi but the 901 sounded more realistic (though technically less capable). I was going to pull the trigger but the bass issue bothered me a bit.
AK240: Detail retrieval was similar but soundstage not as wide as the 901 and not as dynamic. The 240 was very polite sounding, perhaps too polite to me. Vocals are ultra smooth with no grain. Ultimately it boils down to your music preference: for fast-paced or large-scale music with lots of instruments, the 901 is a clear winner. Although I didn't try, but for slow-paced music I can imagine some (especially jazz / female vocal lovers) may prefer the 240.
Nice comparison! I am also interested in the Hugo since day one. Hope it can compete with the 901. Which headphones were you using ? Because of close to 1 ohm output impedance....