Thinner diaphragm and single-ended = faster sound and clearer?
Single ended usually (I'm not saying in this case as we just don't know yet) = less control of the drivers and higher distortion. Thinner diaphragm usually does = faster/cleaner sound.
Thinner diaphragm and single-ended = faster sound and clearer?
Single ended usually = not good...less control of the drivers and higher distortion. Thinner diaphragm usually does = faster/cleaner sound.
That's typically the case. I just wonder if HFM has found some magical ways to improve this orthodox.
I really wanna hear them and see how they measure. We shall see.
Me too. I am holding out on HE-6 purchase to see how the 560 turns out. If 560 is voiced after HE-6 and can be really close in SQ, the comfort factor might win me over.
I would think that with the HE400i and HE-560s a successor to the HE-6s is around the corner.
Lmao, you shouldn't have told me that.
I would think that with the HE400i and HE-560s a successor to the HE-6s is around the corner.
I think HifiMan said they will release the Jade sucessor first
Just switched back to the HE560. The soundstage is excellent and the treble is nicely extended. The Hifiman do very well with treble in general. I can hear air around the instruments and am using it balanced on the GSX Mk2 which gives it more power than single ended .I am fully balanced with the MK2. Listening to Rob Wasserman Trilogy. The soundstage is wide open and signature is very transparent. The balanced GSAX Mk2 is really bringing everything out in this recording. What a spooky transparent recording.TheHE560 makes me feel like I am in the studio with this recording.
Single ended usually (I'm not saying in this case as we just don't know yet) = less control of the drivers and higher distortion. Thinner diaphragm usually does = faster/cleaner sound.