Hifiman he-400i Impressions and Discussion
Dec 4, 2018 at 2:42 AM Post #14,041 of 14,386
@lurk, I think the new HE400i with the 2.5mm jacks are built to a lower QC standard since a friend who has one had to replace the ear pads after a year, they started to rip at the seams in a few places so they were replaced with Dekoni sheep skin ones which seem to have lasted a few years now and look great.
forgot to add that my HE400i gets very little use these days, maybe used once a week at the most.
 
Last edited:
Dec 4, 2018 at 4:55 AM Post #14,045 of 14,386
I live in the tropics, with the headphones getting sun on a daily basis

Hot and humid all year long,
Maybe thts why the p/leather deteriorates fast
You might be right about the environmental conditions playing a part in the deterioration of the leather/pleather. While I do live in Hawaii about 200 yards from Ala Moana beach I usually have the AC on 24/7
 
Dec 4, 2018 at 5:02 AM Post #14,046 of 14,386
I posted similar photo of my hd800s earpads earlier 20181128_122153_HDR.jpg
 
Dec 8, 2018 at 7:34 PM Post #14,047 of 14,386
Wow, that 400i has some battle damage! Looks to me like MANY hours of enjoyment. My 400i are 3 years old, the headband looks good but the earpads are cashed! I bought Focus A replacements and ZMF Universe Preforated Lambskin, not sure I'll ever put the Focus A back on them. I ordered some ZMF Eikon to see what all the clamor is about but either way, I think both pads are winners with the 400i (having not confirmed the Eikon pads).
 
Dec 17, 2018 at 11:53 AM Post #14,048 of 14,386
Just finished test of the new PowerDAC version #2 which is a bit smaller and less noisy(-102dbA). 72 LVC gates power stage(the first one had 64) provides 1.3ohm output impedance and 0.432A output current per channel. In case USB3 with 0.9A rated current, PowerDAC can work safely at >=11.5ohm drivers and provide up to 1W/channel. I think, -102db(A) for an open loop system(no any feedback) is a very good result and it is close to ordinary headphone DAC+amp combos S/N.
 
Dec 20, 2018 at 2:39 AM Post #14,050 of 14,386
Haaaah! I got -106dbA Signal/Noise finally )) Hmm, it becomes closer and closer to an ideal solution for a person who spends a lot of time afront of laptop/desktop and who need high-resolution audio from USB with output power numbers typical rather for AC powered headphone-amps than for USB cable dongle DAC :wink:
 
Dec 24, 2018 at 6:46 PM Post #14,051 of 14,386
For the vast majority of occasions on which I've used the Q1 to drive my HE400i it has been sufficient in terms of volume and quality. These have varied from listening in a quiet bedroom to cycling, none of which have required extreme volume. While I think I've only used it on low gain, I am relying on memory so is subject to correction.

No correction needed. Rather than waste your time just telling you that I can sometime remember things, I took some measurements. The equipment used was
IMG_0033.JPG
Ambient noise.

IMG_0034.JPG
High gain, maximum volume, no bass boost.

IMG_0035.JPG
Low gain, maximum volume, no bass boost.

IMG_0036.JPG
High gain, maximum volume, bass boost.

IMG_0037.JPG
Low gain, maximum volume, bass boost.

IMG_0038.JPG
Audio output to Q1.

I am well aware of many, if not all, of the limitations of this test and discourage any generalisation based on the measurements shown and any exclusive discussion in this thread. Notwithstanding these limitations, this does demonstrate that the Q1 can drive the HE400i hard enough to make some loud noise, especially on high gain which was easily audible many meters from the measurement rig.
 
Dec 25, 2018 at 1:07 AM Post #14,052 of 14,386
As I already mentioned, the simplest and the same time most effective mod of he400i frequency response is a placing on the magnet some phase alignment element. In the best case, it's could be 3D printed phase alignment body, in the simplest case sticky paper(BTW, my 400i has some tracks of applied sticky paper, seems it is factory attempt to adjust freq.resp. but finally, they took stickers off. And after that we should be surprised so different sound of he400i?). I got two freq.resp. with calibrated mic installed in the flat rubber and pressed to he400i, so it is not an absolute value of real response but relative one, sorry I've no artificial ear yet. I adjusted both driver this way to match freq.responses as close as I can, and will keep it a week or two to see my feeling. As you can see, that mode affects mostly 10kHz peak and 14kHz dip. If add some air gap between magnet and paper the effect could be less sharp and around 10mm becomes almost not noticeable. Also I believe effect could be reduced if use less density paper like tissue. The sound with such mod makes more body feeling for a voices, significantly less sibiliants(probably too much), and much more and thinner hi-hats(doesn't looks too much) etc. Overall, I tend to call a new sound of modified he400i as "more expensive" but a bit dark(I feel that 5-10kHz range reduced too much) and probably less loud
WeChat Image_20181225140455.jpg
2018-12-25_13-21-03.png
:wink:
 
Last edited:
Dec 25, 2018 at 9:43 PM Post #14,053 of 14,386
I haven't looked into this at all yet, but is there any known "backplate mod" for 400i's that do not have a backplate?
 
Dec 25, 2018 at 10:14 PM Post #14,054 of 14,386
ls13coco,
not sure if I understand but if a "backplate" means grill then I have to say I tried he400i without the grill and found no big difference with the original frequency response. I even did put there 2 layers of 5mm felt to get less ambient noise propagation, and if I remember correctly it is just slightly affected 10-20Hz. I.e. grill-mods essentially have homeopathic-placebo relief.
 
Dec 25, 2018 at 10:29 PM Post #14,055 of 14,386
AJZ0,
as I remember, a home cinema theater specs require at least 105db max SPL so 87db is far below that(1/63 power difference). Probably you'll get better result at music signal instead of pink noise.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top