daouda
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2009
- Posts
- 270
- Likes
- 0
Hi everybody, this is my first thread here and first of all i would like to thank this quite amazing head-fi community for the help (direct or indirect) they have provided for my introduction to this beautiful journey to good sounding portable music (esp. dftk, clieos, joker, brendon, dervishd, mark and many others). However, my wallet and my bank account officially hate every single one of you.
Anyway, i have received my Hippo VBs a few days ago and unfortunately for me even after more than 60 hours of burn-in they still sound VERY sibilant to my ears, complete with harsh highs and treble. They are by far the most sibilant thing i've ever heard, bringing out obvious sibliance on every S, F and even T vocal sounds, even on correctly ripped tracks (even FLAC) that had never shown any sibilance before to my ears. And they very often sound way too bright for my taste with music that is already on the bright side. On some other darker music however, they sound almost perfect to my ears and REALLY nice and quite detailed and lively and airy (giving those tracks probably the best presentation i've ever heard), with just that sibilance in the vocals.
I am still going to burn them in some more (after reading brendon's experience) but i doubt a miracle will happen now. So i think i will probably need to throw in some "sponge" or "foam" inside the canals to tame the treble harshness and hopefully the sibilance issue along with it.
So here i am asking for your help (i know at least brendon and dfkt have done this): what kind and what quantity of foamy material have you used for that purpose? Would it be possible for you to post pics? The type of "sponge" we have here in france is not appropriate for this use, for it is vegetal and becomes hard like a rock when dehydrated.
So i was thinking, maybe some coton wool? But isnt there a risk to damage the driver with some fibers that could stay stuck inside, past the grill? The other material i thought about is that cushion that comes with the sansa fuze stock earbuds (i dont use them anyway).
Wouldnt the type of material used as well as the quantity have an influence on the sound modification it would produce? The thing is, i want to tame the treble harshness, but i would really not want to make the mids more recessed. I actually would like vocals to be a bit more forward than they already are on the VBs unmodded.
So there it is, i would really enjoy to have your feedback on this and would be very grateful!
On a side note, what's up with this VB sibilance issue or non-issue depending on the owner here on head-fi?? I know that myself, brendon, eiraku and some more report a VERY serious sibilance problem with those phones (at least out of the box, with brendon almost getting his fixed with extensive burn in), while others (most being trustful and respected headfiers) like dfkt, clieos, borako and more report very light to no sibilance at all even right out of the box!!!!
This could only mean one of those two things :
1-The drivers have a very variable quality depending on the batch, which means Hippo quality control sucks and i (and others) have been unlucky to get a "bad batch" VB, and i would be pretty upset at jaben and hippo because
89.90$ is the most money i've ever put on iems so far, and none i've had before, even though much cheaper, have displayed such a glaring fault (even the horrible bloated muddy bass of the cx300 can have appeal for undemanding bassheads, while high sibilance have no fans i've ever heard of).
or
2-People just have (very) different sensitivity to sibilance.
I already noticed i was often complaining about sibilant vocals on badly encoded mp3s while some of my friends (those who dont care much about sound) didnt seem to even hear it. But here it is not an encoding issue, and it would seem like if among "audiophiles" sound signature preference is a matter of taste, the clear, obvious difference between very sibilant and non-sibilant vocals should be something quite objective and non-dependant on the listener, right? But what if this wasnt the case? I'm pretty sure clieos and dfkt have an audition that is at least as good as mine (i am a total noob and far from an audiophile). Would this mean that the human ear's (or brain) perception of sibilance is something that is just a normal variable among individuals?
This would imply that one cannot consider someone else's appreciation of the sibilance displayed by a pair of iems as an objective statement, and should make sure he shares the same kind of sensitivity to it before...
This is a lot of quite badly written rambling, but i would love to hear what the more knowledgeable members of head-fi have to say about this.
Thanks again to all of you, i hope i will get some feedback
EDIT: good lord, didnt realize i wrote that much, this wall of text is definitely not going to attract many people to this thread!!
Anyway, i have received my Hippo VBs a few days ago and unfortunately for me even after more than 60 hours of burn-in they still sound VERY sibilant to my ears, complete with harsh highs and treble. They are by far the most sibilant thing i've ever heard, bringing out obvious sibliance on every S, F and even T vocal sounds, even on correctly ripped tracks (even FLAC) that had never shown any sibilance before to my ears. And they very often sound way too bright for my taste with music that is already on the bright side. On some other darker music however, they sound almost perfect to my ears and REALLY nice and quite detailed and lively and airy (giving those tracks probably the best presentation i've ever heard), with just that sibilance in the vocals.
I am still going to burn them in some more (after reading brendon's experience) but i doubt a miracle will happen now. So i think i will probably need to throw in some "sponge" or "foam" inside the canals to tame the treble harshness and hopefully the sibilance issue along with it.
So here i am asking for your help (i know at least brendon and dfkt have done this): what kind and what quantity of foamy material have you used for that purpose? Would it be possible for you to post pics? The type of "sponge" we have here in france is not appropriate for this use, for it is vegetal and becomes hard like a rock when dehydrated.
So i was thinking, maybe some coton wool? But isnt there a risk to damage the driver with some fibers that could stay stuck inside, past the grill? The other material i thought about is that cushion that comes with the sansa fuze stock earbuds (i dont use them anyway).
Wouldnt the type of material used as well as the quantity have an influence on the sound modification it would produce? The thing is, i want to tame the treble harshness, but i would really not want to make the mids more recessed. I actually would like vocals to be a bit more forward than they already are on the VBs unmodded.
So there it is, i would really enjoy to have your feedback on this and would be very grateful!
On a side note, what's up with this VB sibilance issue or non-issue depending on the owner here on head-fi?? I know that myself, brendon, eiraku and some more report a VERY serious sibilance problem with those phones (at least out of the box, with brendon almost getting his fixed with extensive burn in), while others (most being trustful and respected headfiers) like dfkt, clieos, borako and more report very light to no sibilance at all even right out of the box!!!!
This could only mean one of those two things :
1-The drivers have a very variable quality depending on the batch, which means Hippo quality control sucks and i (and others) have been unlucky to get a "bad batch" VB, and i would be pretty upset at jaben and hippo because
89.90$ is the most money i've ever put on iems so far, and none i've had before, even though much cheaper, have displayed such a glaring fault (even the horrible bloated muddy bass of the cx300 can have appeal for undemanding bassheads, while high sibilance have no fans i've ever heard of).
or
2-People just have (very) different sensitivity to sibilance.
I already noticed i was often complaining about sibilant vocals on badly encoded mp3s while some of my friends (those who dont care much about sound) didnt seem to even hear it. But here it is not an encoding issue, and it would seem like if among "audiophiles" sound signature preference is a matter of taste, the clear, obvious difference between very sibilant and non-sibilant vocals should be something quite objective and non-dependant on the listener, right? But what if this wasnt the case? I'm pretty sure clieos and dfkt have an audition that is at least as good as mine (i am a total noob and far from an audiophile). Would this mean that the human ear's (or brain) perception of sibilance is something that is just a normal variable among individuals?
This would imply that one cannot consider someone else's appreciation of the sibilance displayed by a pair of iems as an objective statement, and should make sure he shares the same kind of sensitivity to it before...
This is a lot of quite badly written rambling, but i would love to hear what the more knowledgeable members of head-fi have to say about this.
Thanks again to all of you, i hope i will get some feedback

EDIT: good lord, didnt realize i wrote that much, this wall of text is definitely not going to attract many people to this thread!!