Here you go ....
.
Thanks mate, hmmm it’s big lol
love those drivers, just wish it’d be less expansive, I could still live with the weight, maybe one day when they’ll go on sales somewhere.
Last edited:
Here you go ....
.
Way too expensive, way too heavy. Pass.
Been through too many expensive and heavy headphones, sold them all in the end, after modding, pad replacements, extra headband padding. The discomfort issues just aren't worth it for longer listening sessions. YMMV, naturally.
718 gr, really?![]()
I know what you mean. My LCD-4s are my least-listened-to cans. Well, no, that's not quite right. My Senn HD800s fit that bill, and that's because I never listen to them anymore. I don't dislike them; I just don't love them enough to jack them in and put them on. But my LCD-4s aren't uncomfortable, at least not for listening of less than an hour. They just don't grab me the way some of my others do. I also agree with you on the angled connectors; seems odd, though perhaps in v2 whenever that comes along. I suspect there is a higher price tier version in the future, and it may well have a more luxurious feel and look to it [that's just a guess].I'd love to hear how it sounds, but 700g is too much for me. If the sound competes with current flagships, the price is actually more than acceptable. I don't like the look though. Plastic DIY PM1 on steroids?
I also don't get why the mini XLR connectors are not angled. That is a major design fault IMO.
Looking forward to the first sound impressions even though I know it is not for me due to the weight. I couldn't live with LCD4 either even though I like the sound.
To me it just seems the product development is not quite finished yet. They need to shave off 200-250g, use higher quality materials and employ a good designer. IF (!) the sound is really as exceptionally good as they claim, people will be willing to pay a slightly higher price. The new technology is exciting and we haven't heard any sound impressions or comparisons yet, so let's wait and see. I truly respect every new approach and effort in this hobby. Well done for that!I know what you mean. My LCD-4s are my least-listened-to cans. Well, no, that's not quite right. My Senn HD800s fit that bill, and that's because I never listen to them anymore. I don't dislike them; I just don't love them enough to jack them in and put them on. But my LCD-4s aren't uncomfortable, at least not for listening of less than an hour. They just don't grab me the way some of my others do. I also agree with you on the angled connectors; seems odd, though perhaps in v2 whenever that comes along. I suspect there is a higher price tier version in the future, and it may well have a more luxurious feel and look to it [that's just a guess].
I agree with most of what you say, though we have heard impressions (I’ve been reading them), and I am dubious that 200-250g can be easily shaved. That’s a ⅓ reduction, and that’s a lot. More importantly, I agree that, if the SQ is as good as it might be, then the market will bear a higher price in exchange for improved design.To me it just seems the product development is not quite finished yet. They need to shave off 200-250g, use higher quality materials and employ a good designer. IF (!) the sound is really as exceptionally good as they claim, people will be willing to pay a slightly higher price. The new technology is exciting and we haven't heard any sound impressions or comparisons yet, so let's wait and see. I truly respect every new approach and effort in this hobby. Well done for that!
From what people are saying about the performance then these aren’t close to being expensive. If they keep up with $4k dollar totl cans at less than half-price.