Xenophon
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2013
- Posts
- 986
- Likes
- 92
Many thanks for your extensive reply, much appreciated. I've more or less come to the same conclusion, took a break from head-fi the past months, had a cool beer instead of the marketing kool-aid served liberally. Still have the V800/V200 stack which is good but as you say, a tiny bit coloured. It's sitting in my apartment in Brussels and I use it with my HD-800. In the office I use my ODAC/O2 and it performs very nicely with the HE-500 (incidentally the best bang/buck cans I own, I keep them on my desk because I'd tear my hair out if the HD-800 got nicked).
With a recording I know I can identify it vs the Vio, but only because I know the Vio's colour and only consistently with known recordings.
The one thing for which I need more power is the HE-6, for that I built an F5-clone. Basically a low-powered speaker amp with a quiet background. Cost me 1K to build, mostly because I went wild&crazy with the enclosure.
This hobby needs some more objectivity and (I'll utter the forbidden evil words) double blind testing. I participated in a couple of tests in the 'sound science' forum (regarding sampling frequency and codecs) and predictably, the result was that above a very mundane level, nobody can consistently pick the 'best' quality.
Building electronics is a hobby of mine, I had the opportunity to open up some very highly rated tube amps that sell for huge bucks. Once you get the nice enclosure off, it's astounding to see how lousy some of them are designed/built. In some cases the 'glorious, vibrant sound' is the outcome of a high score on the crappy-built-o-meter, with resulting non-linear operation.
With a recording I know I can identify it vs the Vio, but only because I know the Vio's colour and only consistently with known recordings.
The one thing for which I need more power is the HE-6, for that I built an F5-clone. Basically a low-powered speaker amp with a quiet background. Cost me 1K to build, mostly because I went wild&crazy with the enclosure.
This hobby needs some more objectivity and (I'll utter the forbidden evil words) double blind testing. I participated in a couple of tests in the 'sound science' forum (regarding sampling frequency and codecs) and predictably, the result was that above a very mundane level, nobody can consistently pick the 'best' quality.
Building electronics is a hobby of mine, I had the opportunity to open up some very highly rated tube amps that sell for huge bucks. Once you get the nice enclosure off, it's astounding to see how lousy some of them are designed/built. In some cases the 'glorious, vibrant sound' is the outcome of a high score on the crappy-built-o-meter, with resulting non-linear operation.