I have compared the two on the V850, which has both inputs - however it was a quick comparison, so I did not notice any differences. AES/EBU cable is a Mogami one, the optical cables are from the KabelDirekt brand. Can't complain at all...Okay. As long as you have a quality cable I would suggest giving AES a try. Perhaps compare both if you're able
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Gustard U18
- Thread starter JaMo
- Start date
TheRealDz
500+ Head-Fier
I am thinking of upgrading, and am curious about your thoughts on what would bring the biggest sonic benefit:
1) Adding an external clock (OCK1 at $350) to my modded Singxer SU1, or
2) Selling the SU1 and upgrading to a U18 for $500?
Thanks!
1) Adding an external clock (OCK1 at $350) to my modded Singxer SU1, or
2) Selling the SU1 and upgrading to a U18 for $500?
Thanks!
Last edited:
Quoted below from post #50I am thinking of upgrading, and am curious about your thoughts on what would bring the biggest sonic benefit:
1) Adding an external clock (OCK1 at $350) to my modded Singxer SU1, or
2) Selling the SU1 and upgrading to a U18 for $500?
Thanks!
Some additional benefit :U18 is a best buy in the 4xx price range. If you owned U16 or Singxer SU 1, 2 or 6, this is a very good upgrade.
DI-20HE is another class that won’t disappoint you, if you go straight to the top league.
1) U18 support DSD512 (SU1 max out DSD256 I think, not that it matters, I don't have any DSD512 songs and I am not a supporter of DSD upsampling)
2) the external clock is 10Mhz, so the DDC still needs to multiply the clock to generate word clock. K2 generator inside U18 is better than the clock generator inside Singxer. So even using same quality clock, U18 should still be better.
BTW, if I were you, I would upgrade to OCK-2 instead of OCK-1, it is not that much difference in price considering the difference in quality of the clock. I am using OCK-2, the details it provides matches with high end systems.
If money is a concern at the moment, upgrade to U18 first, then add OCK-2 when you have the money, that's the way to go.
Last edited:
I would do same re going straight to OCK-2, another level of refinement, resolution and dynamics over the OCK-1. However Leo Bodnar is very good too, especially with a good power supply, v good value. If funds permit U18 + LB would be a pretty good combo I reckon. I have all three and the SU6 and U18 too.. need to sell some gear.Quoted below from post #50
Some additional benefit :
1) U18 support DSD512 (SU1 max out DSD256 I think, not that it matters, I don't have any DSD512 songs and I am not a supporter of DSD upsampling)
2) the external clock is 10Mhz, so the DDC still needs to multiply the clock to generate word clock. K2 generator inside U18 is better than the clock generator inside Singxer. So even using same quality clock, U18 should still be better.
BTW, if I were you, I would upgrade to OCK-2 instead of OCK-1, it is not that much difference in price considering the difference in quality of the clock. I am using OCK-2, the details it provides matches with high end systems.
If money is a concern at the moment, upgrade to U18 first, then add OCK-2 when you have the money, that's the way to go.
TheRealDz
500+ Head-Fier
Thanks, @ray12345. I bought the U18, and will do a comparison with the SU1.Quoted below from post #50
Some additional benefit :
1) U18 support DSD512 (SU1 max out DSD256 I think, not that it matters, I don't have any DSD512 songs and I am not a supporter of DSD upsampling)
2) the external clock is 10Mhz, so the DDC still needs to multiply the clock to generate word clock. K2 generator inside U18 is better than the clock generator inside Singxer. So even using same quality clock, U18 should still be better.
BTW, if I were you, I would upgrade to OCK-2 instead of OCK-1, it is not that much difference in price considering the difference in quality of the clock. I am using OCK-2, the details it provides matches with high end systems.
If money is a concern at the moment, upgrade to U18 first, then add OCK-2 when you have the money, that's the way to go.
Highfive99
100+ Head-Fier
Replacing the fuse with a good fuse like an SR Purple or some such will also improve SQ. Even Gustard's $25 gold fuse will make a difference.Thanks, @ray12345. I bought the U18, and will do a comparison with the SU1.
Unfortunately the AMR fuse turned out to be unavailable so my order got cancelled. Hopefully I will have more luck with the 630mA Gustard fuse I ordered from Aoshida's store on AliExpress.
Highfive99
100+ Head-Fier
I know they're pricey but I noticed a bump in SQ in going from a Gustard fuse to a Purple. The Gustards are better than the supplied fuse but don't match the purples.Unfortunately the AMR fuse turned out to be unavailable so my order got cancelled. Hopefully I will have more luck with the 630mA Gustard fuse I ordered from Aoshida's store on AliExpress.
Yes, I have read very promising stuff about the SR Purple fuses - I just prefer to proceed gradually.I know they're pricey but I noticed a bump in SQ in going from a Gustard fuse to a Purple. The Gustards are better than the supplied fuse but don't match the purples.
Purple fuse has been mentioned hundreds of times in this thread alone. I think we should move forward, there are many more tweaks available for the U16.
TheRealDz
500+ Head-Fier
Has anyone tried the Aune XC1 external clock?
It is intriguing, as it seems to be the lowest cost option, yet Aune consistently punches above its weight.
Unfortunately I am not finding any reviews on it...
It is intriguing, as it seems to be the lowest cost option, yet Aune consistently punches above its weight.
Unfortunately I am not finding any reviews on it...
TheRealDz
500+ Head-Fier
I received my U18.
I probably have about 20 total hours on it, but so far it sounds great.
So far I hear more separation and air, plus less grain in the treble, compared to my previous Singxer SU1.
One interesting issue though; it doesn't like WASAPI Shared output - it injects static/crackling and loses coax digital lock when fast forwarding through tracks. I guess this is a non-issue, since I usually have it on ASIO playback.
I am still thinking about adding an external clock, but think I will let it burn in and upgrade my fuse first, so that I really understand how it sounds.
I probably have about 20 total hours on it, but so far it sounds great.
So far I hear more separation and air, plus less grain in the treble, compared to my previous Singxer SU1.
One interesting issue though; it doesn't like WASAPI Shared output - it injects static/crackling and loses coax digital lock when fast forwarding through tracks. I guess this is a non-issue, since I usually have it on ASIO playback.
I am still thinking about adding an external clock, but think I will let it burn in and upgrade my fuse first, so that I really understand how it sounds.
DAPpower
1000+ Head-Fier
I received my U18.
I probably have about 20 total hours on it, but so far it sounds great.
So far I hear more separation and air, plus less grain in the treble, compared to my previous Singxer SU1.
One interesting issue though; it doesn't like WASAPI Shared output - it injects static/crackling and loses coax digital lock when fast forwarding through tracks. I guess this is a non-issue, since I usually have it on ASIO playback.
I am still thinking about adding an external clock, but think I will let it burn in and upgrade my fuse first, so that I really understand how it sounds.
I still have mixed opinions of using a EXT clock on the U18, it's more musical with ONLY my X26 Pro paired with the Ock-2, it sounds more "dynamic" with the U18 and X26 Pro on EXT mode but the mids and lower mids sound like they're bunched up and pushed a bit back which on some tracks it seems ok but with a lot of other genres, something feels missing.
X26 Pro on EXT and U18 on INT= Quite musical, mids are more prominent, treble is more rolled off but it seems to decay in a more musical way.
X26 Pro on EXT and U18 on EXT= More surgical overall, mids and lower mids pushed back a bit, better dynamics (more bass resolution and slightly better slam) lower treble has more energy.
Dare I say, this sounds more "Focal-like".
phoneslave86
100+ Head-Fier
U18 is doing a great job with the AfterDark Master clock (50ohm BNC cable from Afterdark). I'm going to add an Afterdark LPS power supply and cable next week and see if I can tell a difference. It is claimed to also make an audible difference. Currently powering it with an ifi power x 5v in my PSM136. This is def one of the best upgrades I've seen. I can't tell any difference from the start related to break-in after two days but I've been shaking the table it's on every day as I mess with tubes/cables daily which might be part of it. I did put it on top of a piece of wood from the yard and try to be gentle when swapping stuff
I'd say I value this maybe as much as when I originally added the U18/fuse with I2s vs USB to DAC which is pretty dang big. In part this is because "digital glare" is removed. I had no idea this was a thing. Instant zero fatigue in the sound right away. No doubt some new levels of separation/control/timbre/dynamics I hadn't seen are there right away too. One must get used to it as it is quite a change to the sound but it is also an immediate improvement. It can be softer and also more dynamic with the center stage probably more recessed or softer on average. Surrounding dynamics are clearer, better controlled and can have more thick musical timbres/textures and an increased sense of individual crescendos. Best part is non fatiguing sound for sure! My Beryl headphones are quite forward with raised tuning so this is worth alot to me. I can listen all day at a much higher volume now (Roughly 20 percent louder)
I'd say I value this maybe as much as when I originally added the U18/fuse with I2s vs USB to DAC which is pretty dang big. In part this is because "digital glare" is removed. I had no idea this was a thing. Instant zero fatigue in the sound right away. No doubt some new levels of separation/control/timbre/dynamics I hadn't seen are there right away too. One must get used to it as it is quite a change to the sound but it is also an immediate improvement. It can be softer and also more dynamic with the center stage probably more recessed or softer on average. Surrounding dynamics are clearer, better controlled and can have more thick musical timbres/textures and an increased sense of individual crescendos. Best part is non fatiguing sound for sure! My Beryl headphones are quite forward with raised tuning so this is worth alot to me. I can listen all day at a much higher volume now (Roughly 20 percent louder)
Last edited:
what clock cable are you using for connection to X26 Pro and U18? I am a X26 Pro and U18 user as well, on my system, both U18 and X26 Pro on EXT clock provides better resolution and soundstage with no downside. If your U18 sound more surgical overall with EXT clock, it may be an indication that you are not using a suitable cable for clock connection to U18. FYI, I am using 2 different clock cables for connection to X26 Pro and U18, what is good for X26 Pro may not be good for U18.I still have mixed opinions of using a EXT clock on the U18, it's more musical with ONLY my X26 Pro paired with the Ock-2, it sounds more "dynamic" with the U18 and X26 Pro on EXT mode but the mids and lower mids sound like they're bunched up and pushed a bit back which on some tracks it seems ok but with a lot of other genres, something feels missing.
X26 Pro on EXT and U18 on INT= Quite musical, mids are more prominent, treble is more rolled off but it seems to decay in a more musical way.
X26 Pro on EXT and U18 on EXT= More surgical overall, mids and lower mids pushed back a bit, better dynamics (more bass resolution and slightly better slam) lower treble has more energy.
Dare I say, this sounds more "Focal-like".
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)