GUSTARD DAC-R26 Balanced Decoder R2R+1Bit Dual Native Decoding Music Bridge

May 24, 2023 at 8:03 AM Post #6,106 of 9,893
Mk II - aiming for a one piece template (incl insulating cardboard) I can lift in and out to allow an intial AB. Some tight gaps to squeeze between so need clear line of sight so a fixed lid is a no go for this section initially at least.

Will do a final check tomorrow sans APAs (great for creativity not so much for precise electrical fault finding QA) and have a listen.

Oh and the lid still closes with just a little bit of resistance - result!

20230524_235620.jpg
 
Last edited:
May 24, 2023 at 9:35 AM Post #6,109 of 9,893
Quick question. Has anybody yet compared the LHY Audio OCK-2 to the Leo Bodnar Precision GPS Reference Clock? I thought I was settled on the LHY clock, but now I'm not sure about the actual measurements since they were removed from their website. The Bodnar clock is cheaper, but then you have to get a good LPS, dc cable, and ac cable, whereas the LHY clock already comes with a LPS. Also I plan to hook up my Gustard R26, Etherregen V2 when it comes out soon, and possible streamer to the clock, so in the end LHY might be the way to go? Thanks for any input.
 
May 24, 2023 at 10:15 AM Post #6,112 of 9,893
Quick question. Has anybody yet compared the LHY Audio OCK-2 to the Leo Bodnar Precision GPS Reference Clock? I thought I was settled on the LHY clock, but now I'm not sure about the actual measurements since they were removed from their website. The Bodnar clock is cheaper, but then you have to get a good LPS, dc cable, and ac cable, whereas the LHY clock already comes with a LPS. Also I plan to hook up my Gustard R26, Etherregen V2 when it comes out soon, and possible streamer to the clock, so in the end LHY might be the way to go? Thanks for any input.
Haven't had the pleasure of trying out the LHY clocks, but I can say that the LB clock isn't that fussy over LPS, it seems more reactive to the voltage given out, 7.5v DC seems the sweet spot. But it will work fine with a 5v battery supply too.
The LB is much cheaper but don't let that put you off, LB are not a hi-fi company so you aren't paying that old fat premium......
 
May 24, 2023 at 11:42 AM Post #6,113 of 9,893
hello friends. I purchased R26 and it is on the way.
I read that R26 has FPGA chip. so R26 hybrid (r2r and fpga) dac? what is purpose for use fpga in r26?

is Fpga dacs end point tech sound world? (dcs based fpga, chord based fpga)

I am beginner about audiophille world :)
 
May 24, 2023 at 11:53 AM Post #6,114 of 9,893
FPGA is mostly used for error correction in R2R dacs, for the resistors ladder, afaik. Chord, DCS, Schiit etc use FPGA for other purposes, , think of FPGA as a good for all blank chip, housing proprietary custom code written on it for a lot of different purposes
 
Last edited:
May 24, 2023 at 1:48 PM Post #6,117 of 9,893
Can anyone please tell me which way I should install the gustard fuse? Also should I power both fmc modules with the topping los or only one and the other with an ifi power instead?
I think the fuse has a direction arrow on it, not sure though, as I haven't changed one out myself. The FMC before the fiber optic cable (the dirty side) can be a regular wall wart. Use a LPS on the FMC on the other side of the fiber optic cable (the clean side) were the short ethernet cable goes into the R26 (or music server). If you have an ifi power supply, you could always use it on the dirty side, can't hurt!
 
Last edited:
May 24, 2023 at 1:55 PM Post #6,118 of 9,893
l presumed you where referring to the centre section that is covered in Jake photo,so sorry on the miss understanding,the center section has psu wires in it, hence why I made reference to cables. you can of course shield it all if you feel the need.
That's ok :)
My idea is that the centre section emits RF waves and DAC section absorbs it.
Probably it would be more effective to shield section, that absorbs it, rather then to lock RF in centre section.
 
May 24, 2023 at 2:45 PM Post #6,120 of 9,893
That's ok :)
My idea is that the centre section emits RF waves and DAC section absorbs it.
Probably it would be more effective to shield section, that absorbs it, rather then to lock RF in centre section.
I’ll do the final DAC section too, but I started with what was easiest to do given layout - improving on shielding around central section and then R2R ladder - a nice raised square board with only surface mounted conductors to other boards, no cables to work around. Also the DAC section is unlikely to be the only section that will be sensitive to RFI, best to assume they all are even if also emitters. The more quarantining /separating sections the better I expect as the shielding of each will be imperfect, so the cumulative effect will hopefully be better than if I just did my best imperfect attempt at shielding say the final DAC section.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top