I'm all stressed with the PS500e getting hammered a bit here. If you go back to pages around 195 there is lots of praise. Fair's fair though. I am not grumping, just saying.
Currently I am thinking about the SR325e, PS500/e, and the RS2e.
I wonder if the 325e is much different. Lots say they are close. I seriously like the sound signature of the SR225i/ e-drivers that I have. Therefor I am not going to wish the 325e had a more prominent vocal frequency equalising. (That seems to crop up occasionally.)
The RS2e I never even thought about until maybe two days ago. The PS500/e I thought was going to be a brilliant headphone. I made a list of the things that What Hi-Fi slate about the PS500, plus what I thought. (Copied in here)
The 4-star What Hi-Fi review of the PS500 negative points say:
http://www.whathifi.com/grado/ps500/review#TXvFGwm6xIhl0CoD.99
[COLOR=FF0000]Not the most luxurious build[/COLOR] - not an issue for me.
[COLOR=FF0000]could do with a touch refinement[/COLOR] - tested at £700; now priced £600.
[COLOR=FF0000]leak a lot of sound[/COLOR] - not an issue for me.
The PS500e really divides opinion. Essentially though if you get the chance of a pair for a bargain price you need to know what's going on. Only so little pro-attention has landed on them. I mean the sound of the PS is meant to be for studio monitoring. Maybe some people don't like that, or maybe it really is a bit of a horse. (I am not anti-horse btw. Heh heh!)