brat
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2005
- Posts
- 954
- Likes
- 29
I've always thought that headphones' bass should be tested with non-bassy songs. With bassy ones every headphone sounds "bassy".
![o2smile.gif](http://files.head-fi.org/images/smilies/o2smile.gif)
I've always thought that headphones' bass should be tested with non-bassy songs. With bassy ones every headphone sounds "bassy".![]()
OP probably meant "good songs to test bass impact/thud on headphones", and not ".,...bass resolution/refinement/extension/clarity...".
For the record, I've just bought Ultrasone Pro 650 based on the measurements of the bass impulse response.
There are few headphones with actual non-ringy bass and these are one of them.
Also the fact that nobody mentioned any sibilance. From what I hear in the reviews, they won't disappoint.
Here you go:
http://www.headphone.com/learning-center/build-a-graph.php?graphID[0]=1733&graphID[1]=&graphID[2]=&graphID[3]=&graphType=3&buttonSelection=Compare+Headphones
Maybe that guy actually measured HFI-650? Either that, or the graph looks better... 500 Hz looks atrocious.
Never mind, I had to buy something around this price range.
Innerfidelity is Tyll Hertsens', founder and former CEO of Headroom, new site. I believe that Tyll is using an even more advanced set up as compared to the one he originally put together for Headroom.
It does look better at 50hz than 30hz though its a pretty unusual looking waveform. Headroom doesn't the Audeze LCD-2 up on their site to use a a proper standard, but the SE535's waveforms are pretty **** close to perfect. Most good dynamic 'phone have curves more like this, which actually sounds pretty good despite looking nothing like a square wave since square wave aren't exactly common in music. To compare it so something I've heard which has a similar graph, I'll go with the Sony XB700s. The primary differences would appear to be the 'sones slight overshoot and medium amount of ringing before settling into an otherwise good square wave. The XB700 on the other hand show a significant amount of undershoot, a touch or ringing, and a slow leisurely climb to the top of a mostly flat square wave.
The good news is that its better than it looks since humans are pretty tolerant of large amount distortion in the bass before it becomes audible. I'd imagine it would hit fast and stay fairly well defined at 50hz at least.
http://www.headphone.com/learning-center/build-a-graph.php?graphID[0]=1733&graphID[1]=2851&graphID[2]=2321&graphID[3]=2033&graphType=3&buttonSelection=Compare+Headphones
Ultrasone graph looks horrible in comparison with other decent phones. Avoid it at any cost.
Ultrasone graph looks horrible in comparison with other decent phones. Avoid it at any cost.