castleofargh
Sound Science Forum Moderator
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2011
- Posts
- 10,450
- Likes
- 6,070
And you bring credibility by constantly relying on strawman arguments, generalizing what one or sometimes nobody meant, and asking to prove a lack of impact (the so called "proving a negative"). The burden of proof is on those, like you, claiming an impact. Because that can be done between just 2 DACs with some proper controls. Of course the conclusions might not apply outside those 2 specific DACs or outside the same conditions you used for the test, but at least it's more than your empty claims and attempts to convince by saying that many people think the same. Many people think a lot of things all the time, many of those things are complete nonsense. Welcome to human society. Unless we're talking religious believers, which some audiophiles are hard to distinguish from, properly demonstrated facts should be the basis of belief, not gut feelings, not ideas from a poorly controlled sighted impression, not vague marketing rhetoric.Lol, you and your fellow "all DACs sound the same" cultists have never once presented reliable evidence that all DACs sound the same, something almost the entire world disagrees with you on.
You just blather, as "scientific" as astrologers.
You keep calling out gregorio in particular for not being as scientific as he claims, but so long as your rebuttal is that weak and relying so much on demagogy (you're not the only one, but that doesn't make it better), your post IMO end up supporting gregorio. If those who oppose him mostly are miss poopoo talk and you acting like this, doesn't it make gregorio look quite serious and rational in comparison?