Trunks159
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2012
- Posts
- 3,340
- Likes
- 186
At $200, they compete but not at $300.
At $200, they compete but not at $300.
That's because they're made in Europe for the Europe market(they probably could sell it for $200, excluding VAT, if they wanted to).
Gears are much cheaper in the US because you don't pay for the 20-25% taxes. It's hard for us, Europeans, to be competitive in the FS forums here because most of the North American never paid 1/4 of the cost of the unit to the post man at delivery...
You don't even need an amp. Just buy an eq app, like equ, and boost the low frequencies. I felt that the fs1 was bass light also. Im coming from the kef m500 and ma900.
The Focals have more than enough bass!!!???
These things are bass light and also don't have bass extension. I even preferred the Senn 598 over these when I auditioned them both a year ago. Recently, I was able to grab one from my friend. Around the same price point (actually less), I have KRK KNS 8400. Similar soundstage, much better bass extension, about the same bass impact. The Senn's didn't go into the sub bass either but at least they were more musical and had a good punch to them.
That's a really weird statement. Most of the reviews speak of emphasized bass on the Spirit One. It's not heavily emphasized, but it goes very deep and stays very sharp and fast despite the power. There are certainly headphones with punchier, more emphasized bass but if you say that the Spirit Ones lack bass extension you must've bumped to one of the first generation ones with faulty drivers or then it's the headphone amp's fault. Saying that they lack bass extension is pretty outrageous.
IMO, these roll off quite early, aren't planar tight or a bit loose to enjoy (I can't find the intention/purpose for these). These aren't fast either. I'd put them as a Shure model. KNS 8400 at $150 is much faster. So to me these don't go "very deep" aren't "very sharp" or "fast"
Testing just now from audiocheck.net I could hear the low frequencies with plenty of power up to lower 20s in the Hertz range. No bass boost used. 24 Hz went easily still, but I'm not sure if I heard 20 Hz anymore. 24 Hz was powerful enough that I wouldn't believe the roll-off to be that instantaneous. Then again, no other headphone that I have seem to reach down to 24 Hz with the same sort of volume and they're dead silent at 20. That being said, I don't have any high-end Audezes of Hifimans or such to test these against.
I tried one back a year and a half ago. Another time at a store about 8 months ago. Recently a month ago at home in ideal conditions - my friend bought these very recently. With each pair, I never really liked them. I have used Fiio E10, Fiio E11, iPod/Sansa Fuze, O2 as well as a Teac USB/DAC combo.
Maybe I am just used to a much higher quality with the planars (HE-500, LCD-2 and LCD-3), one could argue that. However at it's price point and beneath it, I found better stuff like D2000, SE215, DT770, KNS 6400/8400, M-50.
Ah someone else who really likes the SE215 even though they are cheap and technically not that good. Still have my SE215 even though I have owned and sold more expensive IEM's something about the overall sound of them which sound good.