I would say that assessment is correct. Never trust anyone on the internet
and listen for yourself. But I guess we can't all run to the nearest high end dealer all the time, so I am trying to interpret what people are saying or even more WHO says what. With that I mean if someone who owns a Z1R, some Denons, Fostex's and a couple of Audeze's says "it's bass light", then I would take that statement with a grain of salt. On the other hand, if someone owning a HD800 or HD800s or even an Utopia says the same thing, I get worried. It's all about vantage point and what you're used to.
Instead of saying "bass light" or "lots of", let me contribute to the discussion by just comparing to other headphones I know. Hope that crude comparison helps at least a little.
Headphone X vs Elegia - Quantity - Quality
Clear - less - better
Elear - slightly more - slightly worse
Utopia - less - better
Z1R - definitely more- same
Z7 - definitely more - definitely worse
D7200 - slightly more - same
D7000 - less sub-bass, more mid-bass - worse
TH-X00 - definitely more - much worse
LCD 2c - slightly less! - same
T1.2 - much less - same
T1p - less - same
T5p.2 - less sub-bass, more mid-bass - slightly worse
M1060 - less - slightly worse
AFC - much less - same
P7 - less - worse
You might have noticed that in therms of the quality score I have not scored any headphone 'much better'. In my view the Clear and Utopia have faster and more detailed bass, but other than those the Elegia is better or at least the same as the other headphone in question. The amount of desired quantity is very subjective. Hence, I did not judge the amount of bass, just stating if the headphone in question has more or less bass.
Again, this is a very basic comparison. Obviously other frequency ranges influence the perception of bass performance. E.g I am not really sure if the Elear has slightly more bass than the Elegia or if its rolled off highs make me think that. Those are the rabbit holes you end up in when going into more detail....