Well done H1 ! And BTW your amp looks gorgeous with the quartet of ST black bottles...you got the last tubes available on earth it seems, I found only a few clear ones. I ended ordering some “straight” Mullards CV1052, (that also look great, ha ha) and are quite cheap...recently, I was playing with 12AX7s and 12AT7s in my int. Amp, and felt that triple mica tubes (military versions) are consistently better (quieter) than standard ones. Of course you can not apply this as a general rule for other types, but anyway I decided to try the “straight” Mullards triple mica vs. the ST double mica.
I also found that virtually all the CV1052 Mullards currently on sale (in ebay UK) are from only two series: M02-B6I2 and M02-B9I2, that means made in Blackburn factory in 1966 and 1969, respectively. A quite interesting discovery was that this was a dedicated “telecom” tube, used in critical relays that had to work 24/7. This explains the need for an amazingly low power consuming tube. And I suspect that to obtain the required stability , precision, amplification level and reliability with so little power on hand (a super efficient tube) can only be achieved with an absolutely top notch design and internals, probably with some exotic metals there, who knows. Anyway, this one is without a doubt the “British C3G”, both are high spec telecom pentodes...and both were “discovered” by H1, our telecom specialist (LOL)
The Marconis VT52 also look impressive, and we’ll see how the three (or four) variants perform against each other. I would even suggest a kind of systematic approach, say, using the CV1052 as drivers with several of the well known high performance powers in the Euforia: EL12 Spez., EL12N (I am currently in love with these terrific tubes, made by RFT east Germany, at first so so, but after 30 hours burn in the sound opened up beautifully, with air, refinement, and at the same time impact and definition second to none) 6H13 (my equivalent 6N5P Svetlana “winged C” late fifties sounds splendid), some nice 6AS7Gs, Mullard 6080, 5998s, and so on...
Thanks for your kind words J...I really do believe these very cheap(ish!) tubes are the best find yet - regardless of price! I may well have been lucky in my acquisition of the smoked glass, military ST CV1052s...there don't indeed seem to be many around at the moment lol...(I do also like aesthetics to be a factor...if at all possible!
).
And I'm sure you're right concerning their need to be robust tubes, because of their purpose - military CV1052/VT52, and GPO CV1052...there probably is some very special metal inside!!
. And could well corroborate
@connieflyer 's and
@Scutey 's findings re. the standardisation of performance amongst the different types available. (I only wish UP-OCC wire was about in those days...but then, every penny was still costed! And I also wish holes weren't put in the metal top caps used in some tubes - this allows corrosion of the wire inside to take place, and hence to possibly break at its connection with the metal cap. Another good reason to glue down that cap before using such tubes lol!
. Of course, the makers never intended these tubes to be used
so many years later!! This corrosion also happens with the wires going down into the base, which is why I gain access to them when adapting my own tubes - to clean up said wires before attaching the new ones...direct metal to metal, then 4% silver soldered...I know...
picky, picky!! ).
Your mention of
systematic testing of different tubes
sounds great, but in practice, this is very difficult to achieve, alas - the time involved is rather prohibitive! Or, should I say, if it is done
properly! As I've said on several occasions before, one needs to live with a tube for quite a long while before getting a true and accurate view...anything less gives results that are not really viable or worthy, as far as I'm concerned. And then you have the problem of audio memory being notoriously short lol!
This is why I never bother going back, once I'm really happy with a tube. As each new one comes along, it
must surpass my previous 'best' by a reasonable margin - and in a good many areas. I want a tube that will perform well with as many genres as possible - I personally won't keep swapping to 'suit'. And thus I always stay with this new-found 'best'...presuming it doesn't develop an annoying trait later on!! But as usual, YMMV!
GOOD LUCK with your own testing however, J...looking forward to your eventual impressions of the CV1052/VT52/EL32 also....CJ