I am fortunate enough to get a chance to spend some time with the X courtesy of
@Calfredo826, and gotta say, these are the
real deal. The extension and ultra-clarity of the lower and upper treble without ever being harsh or fatiguing is truly special (especially since I tend to have a lower treble sensitivity). The soundstage is huge across all axes, especially with height which creates an immersive, dynamic world. Imaging is great, especially with notes that like to sweep from left-to-right.
Speaking of dynamics, the way synth and other instrument notes are portrayed is impressive and punchy. If your genre/track/artist wants a dynamic presentation, well then
X Gon' Give it to Ya (RIP). Pairing X with the SP2000 (the midrange master IMO) seems to actually bring the X closer to a W-shape than the V-shape tuning it seems to be going for. I don't consider the notes thin, nor the timbre particularly off. Sure, it's not as accurate as the Traillii, but nothing outside of Supreme is. My personal take on this balance is
the more dynamic the notes, the less low-level detail you get, a trade-off that comes down to preferences. A flatter transient presentation for instruments will help you hear every pluck or key down to the millimeter, but with enhanced dynamics, it'll naturally detract you from that low-level detail.
Bass is great; visceral, meaty subbass with what I'd consider just slightly above average midbass. There is more midbass than the Odin from memory, or at least warmth in the region. There is good speed for the Dynamic Driver which is supported by the vast staging.
These are all early impressions and I'll spend more time A/B'ing versus the EVO (which is the
still the
bass king), and perhaps a bit the Traillii although they are pretty different IEMs overall with different intended audiences. Should be fun to see what happens between X and EVO in the next couple of weeks
.