Effect Audio ARES S II

I consider myself very fortunate to be a part of an early preview of what will essentially be the new ARES S II. The signature series of cables were popular for Effect Audio for several reasons. One of which brought value to their higher end IEM cables. Today I will be shedding light on some extremely good news for the masses as Effect Audio is at it again, but this time the update in the signature series of cables seems to be not only an update and in some aspects is an upgrade in performance.
The tried a true UPOCC. This material is among the very best for audio transmission and if you're a believer in what a good cable does for your sound. A real UPOCC cable brings some of the best natural tonal character as well as a clean black background for your IEMs to excel. The Signature series uses this copper material as a foundation for a lot of their cables.
I mention real as I know for a fact that many of the so-called UPOCC cables sold on the express say they are UPOCC but. Are they really? Of course they are as long as you believe it. Truth is I happened to own a few cables that claim they are actual UPOCC. I don’t think so. The performance is not what Effect Audio brings. It is their word and their word only right? The only way of knowing it is, is when I compare these cables with the performance of the ARES S. In a way I use the ARES S as a litmus for what's real and what isn’t. My so-called UPOCC also cost a lot less than the ARES S but manufacturers claim it is UPOCC.
In any case this reader is not about the ARES S it is about the II revision. A revision is only good if you plan on upgrading a few things. I suppose there is no rule for what a revision should be about but at the same time. You can’t bring out the same stuff and call it a MKII. Can you? The good news is the ARES S II in my view is an upgrade and it comes with some trickle down advancements from the Code series of cables. Specifically the Code23 and the Code24c.
If you have ever used any of these two cables you will clearly understand why I feel the ARES S II is a nice update in its performance. As good as the ARES S was. The price of them vs something like the Code23 is a good indicator how Effect Audio feels about the level of cable you're dealing with. I think they probably realize just how much competition they have, especially if you shop on the express. Including vendors that claim they sell UPOCC copper cables at a fragment of what Effect Audio sells the ARES S for. In any case it is always good to see our friends at Effect Audio pushing the envelope as they say. The new revision includes a few things to take note of.

What was interesting on the very first listen using my Penon Voltage with the ARES S II was that it immediately reminded me of the Code24c and to a bit lesser extent the Code23 of all cables. The depth of sound was tremendous and the imaging that stood out even more so than using the ARES S. It was its layering and imaging that reminded me of the Code series. It was shortly after testing it for the first time I got a mailer from Effect Audio telling me what was on the new ARES S II and lo n behold it is using some tech from the Code series of cables. It's solid core tech? Which means different geometry from the prior ARES S and something cable fans should rejoice in. The new ARES S II now has an imaging capability that is more enhanced, a bit more nuanced and seems to have greater depth of sound. Many reviews of the Code series bring out the word holographic and sound layering elements to how the cables perform for IEMs and I am getting some of these aspects for the ARES S II.

I had to dig deep but it was interesting to see the evolution of the ARES series of cable. I also happen to own circa 2018 the OG Ares II 8w. Which if you know anything about these older cables was not only received well in the community but the cables was highly recommended as the first higher end cables you should be looking at for an upgrade. I used the ARES II 8w with my EE Zeus back in the day and that IEM was about the most finicky as it got for cable match ups.
The great thing about good cables in general is that they will last the test of time and can be used on any IEM with predictable performance. IEMS comes and goes but a good performing cable can be a constant in an enthusiasts collection of IEMs. I have used the ARES II 8w on too many IEMs to count; and they still perform as good as the day I got them. Compared to the newer signature series ARES S 4w. I can tell the newer cables are an evolution of the copper sound by Effect Audio. Due to the 4w being very close in performance if not a bit cleaner sounding vs the old ARES II 8w and generally 8w variants give a fuller note weight and an enhancement of stage but the differences of these factors are negligible in comparison the the newer ARES S. Considering the old ARES II 8w was sold at a price almost double that of the 4w ARES S. This shows me that Effect Audio has been bringing out more advancements with the same great sounding cables in the price range since.
Not to be confused with the upcoming ARES S II. Which also happens to be an 8w variant and I am all too happy to report these will once again up the sound game for the ARES series of copper cables. In comparison going from the ARES II 8w to the ARES S II I can clearly tell there is an increase of height and depth of sound vs the old ARES II 8w. The old ARES II 8w was more neutral in performance than being a more traditional warmer musical copper infused cable.
Can’t mention exactly how much the new ARES S II will cost just yet but let's just say not only are you getting an upgrade in copper cable performance but they will also conform to what you would expect the pricing to be, perhaps a bit cheaper?. And upgrade for a lower cost?? Well yes!

I did this comparison with a more detailed neutral harmon monitor in the EA1000 by Simgot, one of the IEMs recommended by EA to try out with the ARES S II. There is no question which cable the EA1000 likes better of the 3. The mids get a boost here in comparison to the old ARES II 8w. Better sound separation and imaging. I also noticed an increase of note weight for the IEM sound altogether. The ARES II 8w sounds a bit brighter and more neutral vs the ARES S II. The new ARES S II enhances dimensional character due to it enhancing imaging for the mids. They sound like a clear upgrade, a more expensive cable to my ears and that is what is exciting about these new cables.
The 4w ARES S performs on a very similar level to the ARES II 8w but once again the new ARES S II presents with that enhanced imaging, a smooth yet better separated layering with a more natural slightly warmer tonal character that will match extremely well with modern day harmonish tuned IEMs. It basically makes the EA1000 I tested them on sound like a much higher end IEM the other two cables do not. It's not that they don't make the EA1000 sound bad per se but that greater note weight and enhanced imaging with a more natural tonal character is what really sets the ARES S II apart from the other two. While the other two are clearly a more resolving copper cable, the ARES S II brings a refined slight natural warmth to its presentation that the other two are kind of lacking in.
I wish I had the Code cables to compare these with as I feel they clearly share some DNA here.
I got to preview both the Code23 and Code24c prototypes but if memory serves me correct these ARES S II brings some of what made those cables stand out but will not cost as much and not to mention won't be nearly as rigid in form from either cables especially the Code23. If you see the prices of the Code cable and what the prices will be for the ARES S II will be. I will tell you these have value written all over them. I have already recommended a few of the fellas on the threads that was asking me for cable advice. I am gonna tell you exactly what I told him. Wait for these new ARES S II cables. I don't think there will be too many copper cables if at all that will touch these at the price EA will be asking for a set let me put it that way.

Value, classic copper looks and feel, pliable and highly flexible, EAs UPOCC cable with Code infusion and a good price to go with them? Yes, two very enthusiastic thumbs up from me. Whatever IEM cables you was thinking of upgrading to. Wait for these and they will be released just around the corner. As surprised as I am with these. I am also looking forward to the other signature series cables as well. If the ARES S II is any indication. I think we are all in for a treat.
Pros
-Bass enhanced, brings excellent texture, definition and impact to bass notes
-Mids enhanced, brings upgraded imaging, better sound separation and note weight.
-Slightly warmer natural tonal character which synergizes better with highly detailed monitors.
-Treble enhanced. Solid weighty clean trebles w no enhancement of brightness.
-Solid stage, height, depth and width of stage are enhanced.
-Code trickle down tech involved.
-Much more flexible compared to the Code cables.
-Workmanship. High quality materials and craftsmanship by EA
-Value as it will bring something new for the price level asked.
Cons
-Hush nature of prototypes, what can be said and what can't. I am confused.
-Current owners of prior ARES S cables will be peanut butter and jealous!
-The wait for the final release.