Thank you Blackmore, and Robinje, that is exactly the information I requested for the first part of my question.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobMajor /img/forum/go_quote.gif
You can understand that Craig isn't going to give away one of the expensive new old stock NOS tubes since people have all different tastes.
|
Ummm... I think I've got that, go on... Quote:
Originally Posted by BobMajor /img/forum/go_quote.gif
You can search within this thread for comments on all these tubes but looking at a box on the right which says "search this thread" and then type in one of the names above.
|
You don't say... Quote:
Originally Posted by BobMajor /img/forum/go_quote.gif
For the best performance one of the more expensive tubes is a must.
|
Get out of town, REALLY?
Did you actually read the question, or did you just pounce on your big chance to hound a noob on use of the search function? It goes without saying to even the most basic of readers that people spend big cash on rare, NOS tubes because they are believed to sound better.
The part of my post for which you have elucidated so brilliantly, in essence asked if someone might be able to
quantify a general level of difference between the included 'stock' tube, and a high dollar, hard to find substitute. It referenced my having thus far only listened to Zanas with very expensive tubes as well as my experience with my lesser amp, which showed very little difference in very cheap vs. very expensive.
Therefore, an extrapolation could reasonably be made that someone might be able to use their own experience with lesser amps as a gauge of reference regarding my query.
Can you show me where in this thread this answer may be? Because I'm having trouble trying to condense this concept into a short Boolean for your handy search box.
Or, could you be so kind as to save the haughtiness and tell me if there is a large difference between cheap and expensive tubes with this amp?
