cravenz
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2009
- Posts
- 1,782
- Likes
- 58
A buck ten.
I'm still speechless people are buying those overpriced AK DAP's. We're supposed to be in the middle of a recession.
How are they going to maintain the same DX100 sig when they're using a different DAC chip? Considering we already know the DAC chip I doubt they'll use the same amp chip or even the same implementation in the amp section due to size restrictions. Heck, they're not even using the same OS the DX100 is using. You realize the DX50 isn't meant to be a smaller cheaper DX100 that will sound the same but instead is meant to be a step below their flagship DAP and it will be tailored more for the C(IEM) crowd then the crowd driving stuff like LCD2's. If you want a DX100 sig buy a DX100. I strongly doubt the DX50 will meet the needs you're hoping it will.
I highly doubt the dx50 comes out at 1/4 of the price of their flagship. I think 400 to 600$. I have no clue of
course. They could apply the iriver strategy and sell it 15 000$.
I agree. It'll be less then an AK100, but not by much...
On a side note, I pay a $100 extra, if it was 64GB.