- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Posts
- 28,350
- Likes
- 32,189
Thank you for this!
Hello, look the same track without DSD (FLAC 24/96) and with DSD512
Hello, look the same track without DSD (FLAC 24/96) and with DSD512
This is high school math - Kotelnikov's theorem, or, you can try Nyquist–Shannon version, though delta-sigma DACs (or DSD convertors) use exactly the proof by Kotelnikov: a sum of sync function values. The more values are taken into account, the more precision, and the closer the result to the original analog signal. For the perfect result, the sum must have infinite number of members.how does that work? where does the garbage from the original flac/cd file go?
Yes, but, to extract all the good that it has, infinite number of calculations is required. Offline converter does more than real-time converter, leading to closer to original result.a 16/44 file has some finite representation of an analog wave
This is high school math - Kotelnikov's theorem, or, you can try Nyquist–Shannon version, though delta-sigma DACs (or DSD convertors) use exactly the proof by Kotelnikov: a sum of sync function values. The more values are taken into account, the more precision, and the closer the result to the original analog signal. For the perfect result, the sum must have infinite number of members.
In real life, DACs use some tens to hundreds members ("taps"). Chord programmed their FPGA-based DAC to some thousands, and recently announced a million. Unlike DACs, software converters don't need to operate in real time, and therefore may have much better precision.
Yes, but, to extract all the good that it has, infinite number of calculations is required. Offline converter does more than real-time converter, leading to closer to original result.
You will be paying hundreds later for a MicroSD 512gb or 400gb . If you are able to hear cables differences, you will drop jaws with DSD512Subscribed. I'll try this out this weekend. I'm willing to pay hundreds of dollars for a cable for better sound $20 is a steal
Hello means, this DSD512 file from Xivero XiSRC only play in USB Audio Player Pro, LurkerHiby not support this file and NEUTRON Player not react on my SDCARD formated to ExFAT
You will be paying hundreds later for a MicroSD 512gb or 400gb . If you are able to hear cables differences, you will drop jaws with DSD512[/QUOTE
One way or another this hobby sucks you in, but the joy I get from it is priceless
Well considering all I asked was for people to be polite, I'm gonna assume Canadians and Russians have slightly different view points of how to exactly be it And ya, I'm just bustin' yer balls backThis statement by itself is useless...
Everything affect the sound quality, but playing PCM, your Sigma Delta is doing a live conversions of it own, and it is dependent onto a plethora of everything’s that build up around it (which becomes your own DAC), where as offline conversion of DSD512 is processed at it best.
¡Confirmed! So I just tested a 16/44 file upsampled to D64 VS letting the ESS9028Pro's upsample the file to D256 and I preferred the offline upsampling at D64. I did not have to strain to hear the difference either. It took me all of 5 seconds listening to hi-hat click.Offline converter does more than real-time converter, leading to closer to original result.
Hmm we clearly have heard 2 different things then.
I used my dx200 + amp8 + shure se846.