pompom
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2016
- Posts
- 48
- Likes
- 15
Yep!
With 128gb inside I might have bought it,
with 200/256gb inside (or 2 card slots) I definitely would have bought it,
and with 512gb inside I would have pinched myself to check if I wasn't dreaming
But reality is 64gb + one card slot => we have to deal with that.
I'm convinced the DX200 will have superb sq! But my DSD / 24bit flac collection is just too big atm to consider it, as I really dislike card swapping all the time. For people who don't mind less data on their dap or that don't mind card swapping, this is probably the most interesting dap option atm
I am 100% with you. And even if a 512 Gb "pro version" will be expensive, it will still be much less than A&K's TOL DAP... which still sell well despite it's insane prices !
I have around 500 gb of High-Res files and there is NO WAY I will select which part of my library to take with me and which part to leave at home each time I travel with my DAP. And I do not want to have 2 librairies (of music files and playlists) to manage. So, I may have to stick to A&K if I want 500 Gb !
Come on iBasso, take the chalenge of a 512 Gb version. It will not hurt the sales of the 64 Gb version. A 512 Gb dx200 will just hurt A&K sales