Does J3 SQ meet your expectation?
Jan 26, 2011 at 4:07 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 24

sz1999

New Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Posts
40
Likes
0
Cowon J3 is a very popular media player, i saw people rave about its SQ, but i am very disappointed, so i want to seek your opinion on J3 SQ, does it meet your expectation?
 
Jan 26, 2011 at 7:48 PM Post #2 of 24

macrocheesium

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 24, 2010
Posts
1,563
Likes
35
Can you explain why you're disappointed? Like in comparison with a DAC or other potables? I think it depends on the person; someone who's never heard a good dedicated DAC would think it's amazing, even I didn't have anything but a portable setup for a while. But now that I've gotten into that stuff, I can see why an audiophile would be disappointed.
 
I'll put it this way: the sound is great for a portable device.
 
Jan 26, 2011 at 8:30 PM Post #3 of 24

Mad Max

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Posts
7,556
Likes
337
Location
USA
Dat digititis!
 
Jan 27, 2011 at 11:17 AM Post #5 of 24

Redmetal1897

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 5, 2010
Posts
714
Likes
137
Post portable players sound the same without eq (barring maybe the HiFimans and the SFlo from what I have read)
 
Jan 27, 2011 at 1:07 PM Post #6 of 24

macrocheesium

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 24, 2010
Posts
1,563
Likes
35

 
Quote:
Post portable players sound the same without eq (barring maybe the HiFimans and the SFlo from what I have read)



I have to disagree with this. My Creative MP3 player when Eq'ed still sounds noticeably worse than my Zune HD did, which doesn't even have EQ. Also, I can tell a difference in the clarity between the Zune and iPod Touches (though it's not significant).
 
Jan 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM Post #7 of 24

tds101

Formerly known as nywytboy68
Joined
May 5, 2008
Posts
4,629
Likes
106


Quote:
 


I have to disagree with this. My Creative MP3 player when Eq'ed still sounds noticeably worse than my Zune HD did, which doesn't even have EQ. Also, I can tell a difference in the clarity between the Zune and iPod Touches (though it's not significant).



Um, the creative zen does sound like utter crap with or without the EQ on, but the Zune HD has EQ presets,...they're decent sounding, but their still there. I just sold a Zune HD so I would know. The smaller flash Zunes, as well as the 80/120's didn't have an eq - I owned the 30/80/120 (all 3) myself.
 
Jan 27, 2011 at 2:55 PM Post #8 of 24

rawrster

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Posts
10,566
Likes
206


Quote:
I voted, needs EQ IMO - that's what gettin' a Cowon is all about.


I don't quite agree. I got a Cowon because of battery and not EQ. I don't use the EQ much unless I have a pair of phones that sucks without EQ and that is not the case right now.
 
The J3 however sounds similar to most other players flat. There's slight differences between various other players
 
 
Jan 27, 2011 at 6:55 PM Post #9 of 24

macrocheesium

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 24, 2010
Posts
1,563
Likes
35


Quote:
Quote:
 


I have to disagree with this. My Creative MP3 player when Eq'ed still sounds noticeably worse than my Zune HD did, which doesn't even have EQ. Also, I can tell a difference in the clarity between the Zune and iPod Touches (though it's not significant).



Um, the creative zen does sound like utter crap with or without the EQ on, but the Zune HD has EQ presets...



That's what I just said, not sure if you're agreeing with me or what... I was explaining to Daanish that not all players are the same flat and even with EQ they can sound worse than a flat one. I also just sold a ZHD, and I never liked any of the presets with any 'phones.
 
Jan 27, 2011 at 7:26 PM Post #10 of 24

Redmetal1897

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 5, 2010
Posts
714
Likes
137

Fair enough, which is why I said most 
wink.gif
  Though on second reading it appears I wrote 'post' instead 
tongue_smile.gif

 
Quote:

Quote:
Quote:
 


I have to disagree with this. My Creative MP3 player when Eq'ed still sounds noticeably worse than my Zune HD did, which doesn't even have EQ. Also, I can tell a difference in the clarity between the Zune and iPod Touches (though it's not significant).



Um, the creative zen does sound like utter crap with or without the EQ on, but the Zune HD has EQ presets...



That's what I just said, not sure if you're agreeing with me or what... I was explaining to Daanish that not all players are the same flat and even with EQ they can sound worse than a flat one. I also just sold a ZHD, and I never liked any of the presets with any 'phones.



 
Jan 27, 2011 at 8:47 PM Post #11 of 24

kingpintps

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 4, 2009
Posts
244
Likes
25
J3 with EQ for sure - and it does meet my expectations coming from a Sony NWZ-A829. For me portability and usability is also quite important, so at this point I would take J3 over the better sounding but less usable and featured players.
 
Jan 27, 2011 at 10:08 PM Post #12 of 24

Redmetal1897

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 5, 2010
Posts
714
Likes
137
I voted yes with EQ but thats only because the quality improves significantly with EQ. It's just fine on its own, but since I always use EQ I voted with EQ
 
Jan 27, 2011 at 10:45 PM Post #14 of 24

freeky1

New Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Posts
48
Likes
11
The J3 is a compromise between SQ and portability.  The thing that makes the J3 so great is that it has great sound from a small package with great battery life.  Usng a DAC or external headphone amp kinda' defeats the purpose of the J3.  Of course, separate components are going to sound better, but you sacrifice portability.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top