Quote:
Originally Posted by dvessel /img/forum/go_quote.gif
How about if the Painting smelled like poo or the headphone was shaped like a giant buttock all for the sake of the sound. I'm just making an inverse example to illustrate that you can't really contain things absolutely. How about a car that gets you from point A to B with amazing ease but it's shaped like a giant penis for aerodynamics? I'm sorry for these sick examples.
|
Well, for openers, I wouldn't crash that car into those headphones.
Of course I was exaggerating to make my point. But I think that most people really don't care about sound at all, and that's what bugs me. In other words, they would take terrible sounding, great-looking phones over awesome-sounding, O.K. looking phones, every time.
This is going to sound elitist (because it
is elitest), but I do think that mass-market acceptance degrades just about anything. Before headphones became a fashion accessory, they looked like headphones. No hot colors, no Zwarovsky freaking diamels, no behind-the-neck headbands so as not to muss one's $200 haircut. Now that mouth breathers snap up $5 earbuds by the gazillions, the average phone looks cool, sounds awful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvessel /img/forum/go_quote.gif
And remember, those reviews you mentioned are not from audiophiles so it's expected.
|
That's true. If I stuck to Stereophile, 6 Moons, etc, I could completely avoid the problem. I just like to complain.