RCA (Cunningham) 1949 6AS7G & Tung Sol (IBM) 5998 Comparison
Preamp Tube ---> Tung Sol (Zenith) Mouse Ears 6SN7GT
Headphone used--> Beyerdynamic DT770 250OHM ( Leather Pads)
Tracks used for comparison -->
Before Your Very Eyes... (Atoms For Peace)
Streets Of Philadelphia (Bruce Springsteen)
Mi Historia entre tus dedos (Gianluca Grignani)
Creep (Radiohead)
Man Of War (Radiohead)
Has Ended (Thom Yorke)
Skinny Love (Bon Iver)
So early comparisons are that the 5998 does indeed have the higher reported amplification. To volume match both tubes I had to raise the volume on the RCA or lower it on the Tung Sol. If you own low impedance headphones the 5998 should help push them bass levels up.
The tonal signature is really hard to differentiate between the two, cudos to RCA ( with the Beyerdynamic, Sennheiser comparisons for a later date) . The Tung Sol however has the upper hand on some spots here, the cliche "full bodied" sound is here. Instruments and vocals are easily picked out, yet the RCA gels so melodiously . I like em both. The surprise here for me is the RCA, I wasn't expecting to enjoy it as much as I am now. I sent the seller a message with a huge THANK YOU!!
On some tracks it appears the RCA spreads/blends the midrange (and/or vocals) across the left to right channels. With the 5998 the vocals are more centered, more refined, almost 3d like. I can see how the RCA tubes(or 6as7g tubes in general) get this super wide description, everything gets spread out across the spectrum. The 5998 has the tighter vocal control. It's not as holographic as the RCA. Both tubes extremely enjoyable.
I use to own the later version of this RCA tube, (Mid 60's?) and do not remember them being as enjoyable as this one i have now. To stand toe to toe with the 5998 I have here is very impressive.