Dan's comments on underdamping vs overdamping sound very interesting in light of something I discovered recently, which is dynamic EQ. As opposed to normal parametric EQ changing a frequency range all of the time, dynamic EQ detects transients, and boosts (or cuts) a frequency range only when a sufficiently large transient is detected. It thus "overdrives"/"underdrives" the headphone for those transients. I have found that I could reproduce the same sensation of slam that I get from high-dynamic headphones like the Focal Elex on my electrostatic headphones, which would otherwise be lesser in that department. I'll try it out on my red Noire soon.
It seems that headphones with high macro-dynamics are "overdriving" their drivers during transients in a way that isn't properly captured in the Farina sweeps we normally use to characterize FR. From what Dan says, it should be visible in the impulse response, but discerning those properties from impulse responses is difficult.
And for anyone wondering about amps, I'll throw in my two cents: at a recent meet, I thought the Singxer SA-1 amp gave my red Noire a bit more slam than I was used to. I didn't have my normal gear to A/B test with and it was a meet with people listening and talking nearby, so I might have just been listening louder than normal, but something about the SA-1, maybe its Class A design, seemed to bring out a bit more punch and slam into the Noire.
The technicalities are above my pay grade but I am with you in principle, sounds very reasonable from the gist I took from Dan's comments.