thefitz
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 22, 2015
- Posts
- 2,172
- Likes
- 1,000
A new firmware came out for this recently. Glad to see Creative continuing to support this great (wacky) device!
A new firmware came out for this recently. Glad to see Creative continuing to support this great (wacky) device!
Unless you need the software features (Windows Sonic is good enough for games) or 600 ohm headphone amp, I’d go with the ES100.Hello all
Is this still a solid value proposition for desk use/around the house (bt), when price is comparable too Sabaj da3/NX4 or even ES100?
it's on sale for 100 Euros so pretty tempting, with all its extra features.
Unless you need the software features (Windows Sonic is good enough for games) or 600 ohm headphone amp, I’d go with the ES100.
Not the guy you are responding to but as an owner of both, the es100 is better in every metric. The e5 gets very warm, short battery life, less feature rich software, lesser bt range, much larger... you get the picture.The gaming software would just be a bonus. Primarily for replacement/upgrade over my Fiio A3 to drive IEM's of the pc. Bt would just be nice when walking around the house. Is your recommendation primarily based on portability? Or does the ES100 work good, as dac/amp wired?
Got it, thank you (both). Found a great deal on used sennheiser amp + 660s headphone. So I will play with those and wait for a new flash sale on the es100.Not the guy you are responding to but as an owner of both, the es100 is better in every metric. The e5 gets very warm, short battery life, less feature rich software, lesser bt range, much larger... you get the picture.
This make sense to me.
Now I test everything , my e5 can connect to my computer use as dac , can connect to my android mobile for amp.
Only thing that is not working is line input on e5 when work with my fiio x3. That hurt.
On the pic of the bottom of the pcb, that tiny chip on the bottom surrounded by yellow capacitors with "AIF BCA" looks terribly familiar. I cannot remember what opamp it is.photo courtesy of https://www.facebook.com/SoundBlasterE5/photos/pcb.901273176591848/901272853258547/
Looks like the left headphone jack is less distance from the headphone amp chip. Probably the better choice even though one probably couldn't distinguish the difference.
I guess while I'm at it, I'll post the other two photos from facebook, just for convenience.
On the pic of the bottom of the pcb, that tiny chip on the bottom surrounded by yellow capacitors with "AIF BCA" looks terribly familiar. I cannot remember what opamp it is.
I owned the E5 briefly and overall was happy with it. It certainly offers a solid performance to cost return. If the specifications of the M1060 (which I also had on hand for a time) suggest that the E5 can drive them well without clipping or distortion, and you like what you are hearing I would say that indicates that things are fine. The price you paid is fantastic without a doubt. I would suggest turning off as much of the DSP the E5 has as you can. If you need DSP and you use something like JRiver, or Foobar2000 as a player, I would suggest using the DSP features built into the software.I'm very new to this game, and I decided on the Soundblaster E5 as my first dac/amp as I was able to get a used one for around £35 ( that's around $45 as I write this) which is way under it's retail. Paired with the Monoprice M1060 headphones( which I also snagged for a fairly low price in comparison to the retail) I am definitely hearing improvements in all aspects of the headphone. My only real question is, am i limiting the potential of the M1060 drivers by using the E5? During my research, I read on multiple sites that the M1060s are quite easy to drive, but definitely shine when paired with a DAC/amp. The e5 is a nice little thing but it is far from perfect and isn't without it's issues.