goober-george
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2007
- Posts
- 1,169
- Likes
- 49
Quote:
I noticed, you said you are reviewing by memory, but that surprises me that you score the iaudio x5 lower then the 1st gen nano. I'm not sure how much worse or better the 2nd gen nano is compared to the zen stone, but I rank the zen stone a couple notches better then the ipod nano, in my opnion.
Originally Posted by sigsegv0x0B /img/forum/go_quote.gif Perhaps you should try another NWZ-S616F unit? You have to consider that when everyone else around you says that their units sounds great chances are not that they're all morons.... It is possible I have listened to a good number of DAPs to say that the NWZ-S616F sounds good. This is off the top of my head. * iPod Nano 1st GEN (excellent sound not the best, but if on a scale i'd say 8/10) Creative Zen Stone Plus (7/10) iAudio X5 (7/10) * Sony NWZ-S616F (9/10) * Are mp3 player that I own myself That's from my memory... but the point here is when I claim that I think S616F sounds great I do have a fairly decent point of reference. |
I noticed, you said you are reviewing by memory, but that surprises me that you score the iaudio x5 lower then the 1st gen nano. I'm not sure how much worse or better the 2nd gen nano is compared to the zen stone, but I rank the zen stone a couple notches better then the ipod nano, in my opnion.