The theory behind Opto Dx is interesting and plausible.
The most surprising element, is that so few owners post about trying Opto Dx.
I'm a strong believer in the impact of BNC cables between HMS and DAVE, but I would never ever consider the Opto DX solution, however good it may sound, simply because I hate cable spaghetti. All those extra boxes and cables and power supplies totally rule it out for me. Especially as the BNC cables at either end still matter according to some reviews. And the quality of the power supplies matter too. I suspect others feel the same way, so won't even bother to try.
Thanks for the reply, did you still have to spend a lot on BNC cables? Or does the Opto DX reduce the need for heavy/shielded cables?
IMO it is a mistake to assume that cables must be heavy with ferrites, or heavily shielded, to sound good. Some may, some may not - there are too many variables involved.
For example, when I had the Blaxius BNC cables with their multiple, configurable, shield layers, the shielding combination that sounded best could not have been predicted by traditional engineering theory. And the combination with most shielding was definitely not the best sounding.
And my end-game USB cables, Sablon 2020, apparently have no shielding at all for the signal wires. Earlier, lesser sounding, versions did have shielding I think.
People are free to predict an outcome based on engineering theory and common sense, but only listening will tell you what sounds best in practice.