Hmm...I once had a "scramble" over pricey earbuds with our own, highly appreciated B9Scrambler. Although I have never listened to expensive earbuds, I don't trust them and am highly prejudiced. This may have marginally to do with a window-dressing company I don't trust (Venture Electronics) headed by an arrogant guy I don't trust. This company produces earbuds in all price categories and with all possible cable configurations...and you cannot distinguish optically or build wise, which model costs $300 and which costs $5.
And this "cheap plastic housings with fancy looking cables" arrangement appears to be a widespread tenor in the elevated earbud category.
One of these expensive VE buds had been compared to the Sennheiser HD600, a perennial favourite and headphone of monstrous dimensions, by one reviewer. According to the
laws of physics, how can such a small earbud driver by such an "inexperienced" company compete with the mighty Sennheiser in terms of both sheer size (and also quality)?
The second issue is one of fit and efficiency: an earbud blows some of its sound not into one's ear canal but to bystanders...and the sound perception is much improved using the
"Slater Squeeze"....according to which the buds are rotated by 90 degrees...that works betterl but still showers the other guys in church.
As to cheap earbuds: none of my ChiFi ones in the $10 range are any good (not even with the biggest imagination) and the KZ EDR1/2 are much superior sounding. My old Senns MX560 buds are also lightyears ahead.
The question is: am I doing expensive earbuds injustice are they snake oil?
And now, as unbiased as I am
, now I will read your review, dear crabdog...which will surely will be as accurate and informative as ever.