CCA in ear monitors Impressions Thread
post-14925397
Post #603 of 1,576

pfloyd

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
331
Reaction score
142
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Posts
331
Likes
142
I really really have enjoyed my C10s but recently picked up the CA4s and I think I enjoy them even more. The C10s have a thick, effortless sound with forward mids, punchy but thick bass and forgiving treble to provide for good extended listening sessions, where the CA4s thin out the mids a bit for a v shaped signature that widens soundstage with crisp but non-sibilant treble and an even punchier, more sub bass emphasized signature. They really complement each other well and both respond very well to the EarStudios equalizer. Really unbelievable what one can get for the coin nowadays. When you compare these with the UE TF10 that went for 100 bucks ten years ago Black Friday, I’d say we’re all a little spoiled today
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
post-14925717
Post #604 of 1,576

1clearhead

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
3,423
Reaction score
2,946
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Posts
3,423
Likes
2,946
I really really have enjoyed my C10s but recently picked up the CA4s and I think I enjoy them even more. The C10s have a thick, effortless sound with forward mids, punchy but thick bass and forgiving treble to provide for good extended listening sessions, where the CA4s thin out the mids a bit for a v shaped signature that widens soundstage with crisp but non-sibilant treble and an even punchier, more sub bass emphasized signature. They really complement each other well and both respond very well to the EarStudios equalizer. Really unbelievable what one can get for the coin nowadays. When you compare these with the UE TF10 that went for 100 bucks ten years ago Black Friday, I’d say we’re all a little spoiled today
Yea, the C10 with the aftermarket mix copper/silver cable are a wonder to have with incredible ease of any genre. But, what surprised me with the CA4 is the incredible upper clarity, and that lower quick bass punch, that kind of has a similar sound signature approach to the C16. I can see these easily being favored for its linear-like sound, which makes them unique to the rest of the CCA lineup!
 
     Share This Post       
post-14925736
Post #605 of 1,576

Dani157

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 24, 2018
Messages
521
Reaction score
598
Location
India
Joined
Nov 24, 2018
Location
India
Posts
521
Likes
598
Yea, the C10 with the aftermarket mix copper/silver cable are a wonder to have with incredible ease of any genre. But, what surprised me with the CA4 is the incredible upper clarity, and that lower quick bass punch, that kind of has a similar sound signature approach to the C16. I can see these easily being favored for its linear-like sound, which makes them unique to the rest of the CCA lineup!
Have added CA4 to my cart. Now waiting payday to go crazy on AliExpress:stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes: if i skip on QCY tws qs1 then probably will buy the new KZ cables gold silver and copper silver. One for **** and other for ZSN and CA4. In terms, of mids vs highs vs lows, are CA4 balanced? Or it has recessed mids?
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
post-14925875
Post #607 of 1,576

pfloyd

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
331
Reaction score
142
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Posts
331
Likes
142
For me, the C10 vs CA4 comparison goes like this: the C10s extra drivers in the middle really help it pressurize the space effortlessly, giving extra emphasis to the middle without muddling it up as what might be expected for such a budgeted attempt, really amazing how coherent they are, but the emphasis in the middle does collapse the soundstage a bit while increases depth of stage.The CA4, with just one ba, does recess the mids a bit but not to the degree that the ZS4 does, which results into a wider soundstage bookended with crisp hi’s and thunderous lows but still very articulate middle. Both the C10 and CA4 are exquisitely tuned pieces of kit and highly recommended. Note that I run them off the EarStudio and liberally add smile type eq to taste, that they eat up with aplomb.
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: DAVID_54
post-14926345
Post #608 of 1,576

FastAndClean

Previously known as presata
Joined
Oct 26, 2013
Messages
5,194
Reaction score
5,197
Location
mars
Joined
Oct 26, 2013
Location
mars
Posts
5,194
Likes
5,197
Find the best tips, with 5db boost under 50hz and I am in heaven, what a bass response, tigh, fast, super clean and deep, just amazing , I love those funny looking blue things
IMG_20190429_185726.jpg
 

Attachments

Last edited:
post-14926946
Post #610 of 1,576

HardstyleLoco96

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
1,178
Reaction score
580
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Posts
1,178
Likes
580
Not likely, I suppose against branded ones. But, when tuned right, of course anything is possible. :wink:

...Occassionally, I visit my friends shop in China, and hear the best of the best for hours there. So, when the C16 is tuned right, they are not that much different, IMHO.

I've owned many and either sold or gifted them. You could checkout my profile on my latest ones:
https://www.head-fi.org/members/1clearhead.363120/


-Clear
Just saw your list. So I am guessing you prefer the CCA C16 over the Magaosi MGS - 401? If so, that's already saying a lot :wink:
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: 1clearhead
post-14927169
Post #611 of 1,576

josesol07

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
310
Reaction score
148
Location
Caracas, Venezuela
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Location
Caracas, Venezuela
Posts
310
Likes
148
I don't have many experience, and i will receive the BQEYZ BQ3 in 3 days, so i will be able to compare the DD vs BA bass.
Looking forward to your comparison between C16 and BQ3 :L3000:
 
     Share This Post       
post-14928130
Post #612 of 1,576

FastAndClean

Previously known as presata
Joined
Oct 26, 2013
Messages
5,194
Reaction score
5,197
Location
mars
Joined
Oct 26, 2013
Location
mars
Posts
5,194
Likes
5,197
Yea, the C10 with the aftermarket mix copper/silver cable are a wonder to have with incredible ease of any genre. But, what surprised me with the CA4 is the incredible upper clarity, and that lower quick bass punch, that kind of has a similar sound signature approach to the C16. I can see these easily being favored for its linear-like sound, which makes them unique to the rest of the CCA lineup!
Hi Clear, you are right about the tips with very wide bore on C16, the treble sound improved compared to other tips with smaller bore, i made a edit section on my review under the treble impressions, the overall rate is up from 4 to 4.5 stars
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: 1clearhead
post-14928154
Post #613 of 1,576

Slater

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 5, 2015
Messages
11,623
Reaction score
19,417
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio USA
Joined
Jun 5, 2015
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio USA
Posts
11,623
Likes
19,417
Hi Clear, you are right about the tips with very wide bore, the treble sound improved compared to other tips with smaller bore, i made a edit section on my review under the treble impressions, the overall rate is up from 4 to 4.5 stars
It’s surprising to me how many IEMs improve with wide bore tips.

In my younger years, I used to shy away from wide bore tips because I didn’t like the reduction in low end. But as my tastes became more refined and I really started to appreciate the high end (as well as understand how too much low end can overpower and choke out everything else), I started giving wide bores a chance.

And it has always been amazing to me how much the character of an IEM can change with wide bores. It can go from compressed, boomy, metallic, and shouty with narrow bore tips to a more open, natural, cleaner and pleasant treble presentation.

Which makes a lot of sense. When you speak through a small diameter pipe or cardboard tube, your voice sounds completely different.

I have turned many IEMs from meh to wow by switching to wide bore tips. The only disadvantage of them is the fact that the tips don’t fit securely on many nozzles (bad either don’t fit at all, or are loose and fall off). But I always try my various wide bore tips, and can often find one that fits well enough to at least try it out and see if the sound improves or not.

Why the majority of manufacturers include generic narrow bore tips as (sometimes) the only stock tips is sad. Does no one at these companies tip roll in-house and notice the often positive difference?
 
Last edited:
post-14928162
Post #614 of 1,576

FastAndClean

Previously known as presata
Joined
Oct 26, 2013
Messages
5,194
Reaction score
5,197
Location
mars
Joined
Oct 26, 2013
Location
mars
Posts
5,194
Likes
5,197
It’s surprising to me how many IEMs improve with wide bore tips.

In my younger years, I used to shy away from wide bore tips because I didn’t like the reduction in low end. But as my tastes became more refined and I really started to appreciate the high end, I started giving wide bores a chance. And it is amazing how much the character of an IEM can change with wide bores. It’s can go from compressed, boomy, metallic, and shouty with narrow bore tips to open, natural, and easy on the ears.

Which makes a lot of sense. When you speak through a small diameter pipe or cardboard tube, your voice sounds completely different.

I have turned many IEMs from average to wow by switching to wide bore tips. The only disadvantage of them is the fact that the tips don’t fit securely on many nozzles.
agree, **** also likes wide bore tips, however i have in ears that have to be used with middle size(HQ10) or small size bore (ER4S) or the sound is not optimal, but most of the time wide bore is the way to go
 
post-14928173
Post #615 of 1,576

BadReligionPunk

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Nov 30, 2015
Messages
1,663
Reaction score
2,978
Location
Saint Louis
Joined
Nov 30, 2015
Location
Saint Louis
Posts
1,663
Likes
2,978
It’s surprising to me how many IEMs improve with wide bore tips.

In my younger years, I used to shy away from wide bore tips because I didn’t like the reduction in low end. But as my tastes became more refined and I really started to appreciate the high end, I started giving wide bores a chance. And it is amazing how much the character of an IEM can change with wide bores. It’s can go from compressed, boomy, metallic, and shouty with narrow bore tips to open, natural, and a much cleaner and pleasant treble presentation.

Which makes a lot of sense. When you speak through a small diameter pipe or cardboard tube, your voice sounds completely different.

I have turned many IEMs from average to wow by switching to wide bore tips. The only disadvantage of them is the fact that the tips don’t fit securely on many nozzles.
Agree. However sometimes there is just nothing that can be done and comfort and size take precedence and out come the Sony hybrids.

Right now had to settle on a small bore tip for comfort reasons on the BQEZY KC2. Right now have them on the BQ3 and so far they are not causing any pain.
Wide bore sounds much much better on the BQ3 but cant find one that is comfortable and will stay on the fat stubby nozzle.
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 2, Guests: 5)

Top