Lack of streaming on a high end DAP is a non-starter for me. That was not always the case and in fact when I purchased my last high end DAP I did so knowing it did not offer native streaming because I wanted to "focus on ultimate performance". However, after listening and comparing to a lot of different TOTL daps it is now my opinion that what little performance compromise (if any) a DAP makes by offering streaming is minimal relative to differences in how each manufacturer tunes their offering, synergy with different headphones, mood at the time of listening, listening acuity and listening preferences.
The ability to listen privately to whatever I want wherever I want and to explore new music at will is something I can not give up.
To satisfy those who still insist that streaming results in an audible sonic compromise I wonder if it is possible in a dap to offer a pure mode where all hardware, operations, etc. related to streaming could be disabled? For example a non-streaming DAP with the option to add a streaming module would be cool. Questyle tried to do this in a manner by allowing users to use their phone as the streaming module by connecting to their QPM dap, but the need to carry two devices is not optimal.
Well, from someone that has TBs of digital music on a HDD, I couldn't care less about streaming. I can also rotate playlists by replacing the files on the player with new ones from my hard drive.
I am not arguing that streaming isn't useful and I understand it can be very convenient, but it's not that necessary for everyone.
However, if a DAP has streaming capabilities, one is not forced to use this feature. I assume any DAP will have an internal memory or a card slot. So, if streaming has a detrimental effect on sound quality, one can simply not use streaming.
My DAP has streaming, but I switch off all connections (WiFi and Bluetooth), I keep it in airplane mode. I very much doubt that in this way the sound quality or battery life are affected in anyway whatsoever.
I can completely relate to both the posts.
I was never into DAPs. I own a lg v30+ and could care less about audio quality while commuting. My reasoning was that my desktop setup is where I come to unwind and therefore it should sound the best and get the most attention (funds, listening time, upgrades, etc). Sometime late last year I realised that eventhough I had the right gear, I still wasn't able to listen to music for the only reason that I had to be tethered to where my setup was. Moreover sometimes I would come from work and I would be so tired that the very idea of turning on the amps and dacs and wading through the ridiculous daphile gui was off-putting. I would end up listening to my v30 using my IEMs.
I initially tried putting together setups at three different places but as you can guess, it didn't workout either. Anyway, I realised that a good portable device is what I needed.
DAPs are ofcourse the only sensible option and I have been extensively auditioning devices; looking to finally get mine this year. Some of my general observations:
1. There are differences between the ultra high end, high end , mid tier and beginner DAPs but the difference is not as stark as it is for desktop systems.
2. The gain in performance from high end to the uber costly daps is very slim and in most cases only a matter of tuning.
3. DAPs have also come a long way in terms of technology and after listening to stuff like M17 and Shanling M9, I think portable dac/amps might become redundant if there is ever a price breakthrough in the dap market.
4. (This one is controversial but I'm gonna stick to my observations) I found that android based DAPs (or those with heavy gui based OSs) lacked the SQ when compared to those with relatively simple UIs or low resource implementions. A curious case is that of the Quloos QA361; a 700 odd buck dap with a UI so barebones that it might seem almost unusable in 2022,; yet sounds better than DAPs twice/thrice it's cost.
5. This brings me to streaming: Digital is the way forward. I think streaming is a god send and with the kind of Internet speeds we have these days, it has never been easier to discover and listen to new music. However, I also collect CDs coz when it comes to absolute sound quality, local red book playback (spinning/ripped wav) is still king. I feel that if someone relies on streaming only, getting a 2K or 3K player might not be justified in terms of SQ (atleast from what I heard).
6. I've also had a chance to listen to these mammoth daps like the M30, Quloos qa390, shanling em5, etc.; I wouldn't call these DAPs per say. They aren't as convenient and ofcourse sound way different (mostly superior) to their much smaller competitors. Unless someone is looking only at SQ and portability, these devices might not make much sense.
Anyway looking forward to listen to more devices (especially the N8ii). Sorry for the long post and thank you for your time!
(P.S.: I've ranked the DAPs I've heard till now in the rank your the best daps you've heard thread:
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/rank-the-best-sounding-daps-that-you-heard.936707/post-16802756).