- Joined
- Mar 30, 2012
- Posts
- 15,788
- Likes
- 2,328
My experience has taught me that headphones by far make the biggest difference in sound quality. With today's hardware there is very little difference in true sound quality between DAP's even hundreds of dollars apart. After all they are using alot of the same parts across multiple DAP's at multiple price points. Give me a DAP like the N3 and my favorite B&W P5S2's over a more expensive DAP and cheaper quality headphones any day.
Give me a pair of headphones that has the sound signature I like and they will make any reasonably priced DAP sound good. Give me a pair of headphones with a sound signature I don't like and no DAP at any price will sound good.
Thanks for your review and insights, very interesting indeed. The one point I'll take you up on is the choice of headphones (and speakers for that matter). I currently have a set of B&W headphones (P5 Series 2 and P7), both of which are fairly well-regarded (the P7 more than the P5 obviously) and which cost several times more than the N3. I also have a pair of $10 Rock Zircon IEMs I just bought, and am quite impressed by what they can do (for the price - better than many $100 IEMs I've heard). I'm also in the market for higher-end headphones (like the Fostex TH-X00 for example) that I believe will take my listening to an even higher level - all with the N3 AND my desktop setup.
So my point here is, why limit the quality I can get from the N3 by limiting my choice of headphones? You're not doing the N3 any favors by pairing it with lower-end headphones, no matter the reason. I've listened to a few of my friends' less impressive headphones with my N3, and in each case it sounds significantly worse than when I have my P7s on. Start with the best headphones you can buy, and match it with a good source (N3 etc.). Just my 0.02
Considering everyone is going to use this or any other DAP with headphones or iem's then offering opinions on headphones is perfectly legitimate in my opinion. Not really talking about justification on your part but my own observations based on my experiences.
The discussion that resulted after my impressions was not one focused around sharing your opinion of your B&W P7/P5 with the N3, but rather a progression of the idea that my impressions of the N3 are limited by my using cheaper quality headphones, that idea or thought isn't needed here or any where. My cheap little HD 668B doesn't change how the N3 sounds, when I moved from my HD668B to my ES 10
The ES 10 in terms of cost probably runs some where around $330 stock, then there's the wood cups on mine, so let's add another $150, and the full driver to 3.5mm re-cable that's another $100, and the... 2 years spent modding it [it measure's really beautifully and sounds the same] let's just chalk in another $100 so right around $680... oh wait I forget the pads were changed to leather, from what ever the stock was... throw in another $20 for a pad swap and were at $700
I really low balled those prices based on the costs I've had modding my Denons, Lawtons Audios level 1 pack is $125, Ear Pads and Internal Modding... wood cups add another $350 and a real price for a hard re-cable is upwards of $125 ish, Pads can be as cheap as $10 to almost $125,My W1000X had ATH L3000 pads were imported for $115 when they were available, Audeze Vegan pads run around $70 but typically a nice leather pad sits around $50, and given that the ES 10 is so small let's assume the Leather Pads are half the price of a full sized pair
I really low balled those prices based on the costs I've had modding my Denons, Lawtons Audios level 1 pack is $125, Ear Pads and Internal Modding... wood cups add another $350 and a real price for a hard re-cable is upwards of $125 ish, Pads can be as cheap as $10 to almost $125,My W1000X had ATH L3000 pads were imported for $115 when they were available, Audeze Vegan pads run around $70 but typically a nice leather pad sits around $50, and given that the ES 10 is so small let's assume the Leather Pads are half the price of a full sized pair
So since were on the topic, let's look at the ES 10 Measurements vs a B&W P5 and a P7
So looking at all the data, what do we see? Well the B&W 7 is certainly eclipsed by me ES 10 in therms of clarity, it's quite dark up top and the THD has some nasty spikes in addition to that upward slope, vs the downward slope of the ES 10 I had, Both have a downward slop from the lows, but I've got less distortion in the mid to high range, also note the bass not peaking over the mids, notice the humps at both 80hrz and 1-2k pair that with a brighter top end, and the ES 10 gains the edge in total clarity and imaging, less distortion and a more even frequency response make for a sharper stereo image, Interestingly though the B&W P5 measures amazingly well! It's got BETTER clarity in the bass, but like the P7 has those nasty spikes and upward sloping from the midrange upwards, an honestly that's alright! I'm not putting down or discrediting either of them, From what I can see, I'd imagine the B&W 5 and B&W 7 are amazing in production headphones, something that EVERY one can own and enjoy. I'd love to hear them both, as I imagine they'll give something like the Oppo PM 3 a real run for it's money
Though a modded headphone... is a bit of a unicorn. Only 1 Exists and nothing else sounds like it does... I keep it as a point of reference, for what's possible with a mid range closed back. I own it because it's rather dark but also has amazing clarity, an it's very reflective of what your plugging it into and is a completely different sound signature form the HD 668B, my point is that when I changed from the Superlux HD 668B to the modded ES10... the N3 didn't SUDDENLY become something it wasn't. My impression of the N3 remained the same. It vs my HM601 had better clarity, better micro detail [so little noises... like a page turn during a classical track, or the sound of some one taking a breath in the mic before they sing, or what ever weird noises were captured during a recording] and better macro dynamics [literal upward and downward shifts of an instrument of vocalist in dB] are more clear with the N3, on the other hand the HM601 with both my $50 headphone and what might as well be a $700 headphone, had better timbre, more precise imaging [or placement of sound within the sound stage both in terms of depth and width] and better macro details or transients. No matter what headphone I listen with, the strengths and weakness of the N3 do not change.
A cheap $50 headphones has not held back the N3 in my experience, moving onward what is it about the N3 and B&W 5/7 combo that you like?
I appreciated how the N3 pair'd with my ES10 really brought a few of my quieter jazz tracks to life! Listening with the HM 601 is more technically correct, but it's a little more relaxed. The N3's overall better dynamics and top end clarity really brought some EXCITEMENT to Mile's Davis So What
Last edited: