[mbd2884]

Diana Krall better than both for talent, and for appearance.

Sultry, not a pop whore

 

[Sabrage]

Quote:

Originally Posted by iriverdude /img/forum/go_quote.gif Neither.

Holy god. I've never seen greasier women in my life.

 

[VicAjax]

i voted for Britney because all the skanky paparazzi pictures of her are far more hilarious.

 

[iriverdude]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sabrage /img/forum/go_quote.gif Holy god. I've never seen greasier women in my life.

Gay?

Those girls have more talent in pinkie finger than Britney and Christina combined. They can play multiple instruments. And write their own songs, and play live & unrehearsed. Britney has to dance to her album playing over the speakers.

Britney and Christina are ugly & talentless.

Andrea- flute & piano.
Caroline- drums and piano.
Sharon- bodhran, violen and piano.
Jim- whatever

 

[insyte]

Quote:

Originally Posted by iriverdude /img/forum/go_quote.gif Gay? Those girls have more talent in pinkie finger than Britney and Christina combined. They can play multiple instruments. And write their own songs, and play live & unrehearsed. Britney has to dance to her album playing over the speakers. Britney and Christina are ugly & talentless. Andrea- flute & piano. Caroline- drums and piano. Sharon- bodhran, violen and piano. Jim- whatever

But they still look all sweaty in that pic

 

[iriverdude]

Maybe the three sisters were snogging each other?

 

[SleepyOne]

Neither. Shakira in Spanish is preferred. But as the poll is only those two, then Xtina it is.

 

[GreatDane]

The Corrs "Live In London" DVD is great. Talent? Yes.

 

[ArmednInsane]

I think Christina Aguilera has talent and that Britney Spears to be a good performer/ entertainer, but I don't find them both hot or anything.

 

[aris]

Quote:

Originally Posted by nsx_23 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Where's the "I'd rather listen to Bose than listen to either" option?

BOSE FTW

 

[DrBenway]

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArmednInsane /img/forum/go_quote.gif ...Britney Spears to be a good performer/ entertainer...

This is the standard comment that I always hear about her. No one would say that she can sing. She doesn't dance well enough to win a place as a backup dancer on someone else's tour.

So if she can't sing and she can't dance, what, exactly makes her a good "performer/entertainer?" What exactly is she good at? Staring vacantly at cameras while having a good body? Getting in trouble?

I just don't understand the appeal. Go to any medium-sized city in America, and you will find prettier young women, some of them with actual talent. Why her?

 

[grawk]

She can both sing and dance, whether you like her work or not.

 

[Uncle Erik]

Britney. She's in my 2009 Dead Pool.

Christina just seems so... stable.

 

[Brighten]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Erik /img/forum/go_quote.gif Britney. She's in my 2009 Dead Pool. Christina just seems so... stable.

Haha... that's awesome.

 

[ArmednInsane]

Well, I think she has average talent for dancing and singing, but she manages to entertain people enough to be able to sell her albums. So, she has a nice body and that plays a big role in her success, the nice body is still part of the entertaining process. For example, ever seen a pop star that gets really big without a talent for singing, but has big fat body?

Maybe there are more younger girls in America that look better than her, but not all of them may have her discipline to maintain the body (I am just guessing here), or her voice (which even though is average still sings better than me or people around me), or her willingness to be in the news, or the list will goes on and on and on. Maybe one day, one of those girls will replace her, but for now, she is what we get.

Christina may not be a better performer and entertainer than Britney Spears, she is also not that hot, however she can sing better than Britney and her songs sell using her voice.

Guess, in the end, it still comes down to album sales = money

Oh, BTW, even though I respect Diana Krall more, I kinda think she is not hotter than Britney Spears or Christina, I think they are on the same level


Quote:

Originally Posted by DrBenway /img/forum/go_quote.gif This is the standard comment that I always hear about her. No one would say that she can sing. She doesn't dance well enough to win a place as a backup dancer on someone else's tour. So if she can't sing and she can't dance, what, exactly makes her a good "performer/entertainer?" What exactly is she good at? Staring vacantly at cameras while having a good body? Getting in trouble? I just don't understand the appeal. Go to any medium-sized city in America, and you will find prettier young women, some of them with actual talent. Why her?